It Came from the Library Shelves: Doctor Who, Season 2

Explanatory Note: Just to put things in context, I was a huge Doctor Who fans as a kid, up through Tom Baker’s majestic run back in the ’80s. However, my familiarity with the subsequent Doctors and the show’s continuity before it was cancelled in 1989 is rather more spotty. If you don’t know what a Time Lord or a Dalek is, you may wish to move on.]

I’ve just watched the first eight episodes of the ‘second season’ of the recent Doctor Who revival (which helps explain why I haven’t gotten most posting done). This is the season which saw actor David Tennant taking over for the quickly-departed Christopher Eccleston.*

[*Eccleston is the winner of a “You Ass” award, citing as his reason to leave after one season that he “didn’t want to be typecast” in the role of the Doctor. Dude, you signed up to play friggin’ Doctor Who, which is along the lines of playing James Bond. How could you have not considered the typecasting issue in the first place?]

I must say, the Doctor is running perilously low on regenerations, especially since it seems that Paul McGann’s one appearance as the Doctor, in the 1996 American pilot movie shown on Fox, is considered cannon. By my count, Tennant is the 10th Doctor, and as I recall, Time Lords get twelve regenerations, for a total of thirteen lives. The Doctor has been burning through these rather precipitously of late.

Of course, they will cheat this. The new run of the show has established that the Doctor is the last of his kind, the Time Lords having all been wiped out in an apocalyptic war with the Daleks. So I imagine they will say something like, now that he’s the last one, the Doctor has unlimited regenerations.

Anyway.

I have to admit, I like Tennant’s Doctor more than Eccelston’s, although the latter was probably the best since Tom Baker’s legendary run in the role. Eccleston’s blue collar yob wore on me a bit, I must admit. And while the new Doctor is as courageous and justice-oriented and, ironically, humanitarian as ever, I like the fact that Tennant’s Doctor also has a bit more edge. “I’m so old now,” he warns one adversary. “I used to be so full of mercy. You get one warning. That was it.”

The new Doctor can also be amusingly arrogant, although that’s not completely out of character for the Doctor of the past, either. “This is my lover, the King of France” the Doctor is told upon meeting none other than the 18th Century’s King Louis. “Yeah?,” he sniffs. “Well, I’m the Lord of Time.”

Still, I’m remain at least partly offput by producer Russell T. Davies tendency to mold the show in a ‘mod’ fashion, as if his central theme is “This isn’t your father’s Doctor Who!” The Doctor should seem rather (literally) timeless, but Davies’ Doctors are both rather aggressively of the here and now. Just the manner in which they dress seem s designed to make them fit into present day England, which is a change right there. Not that they need to go as far as Colin Baker’s eyebleed-inducing Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, but whatever. And are those glasses the Doctor now wears for reading an affectation? I suppose they’ll say his eyes were messed up during his most recent, problematic regeneration.

I don’t know, although there is much I really like here, the apparent goal for Davies of being Doctor Who’s Joss Wheden, with the Doctor suddenly full of trivia about punk rock and pop culture and the occasional trendy Brit-Lib sneer at Margaret Thatcher (really, all the murderous dictators on all the planets he’s met, and Margaret Thatcher bugs him?), just doesn’t do it for me. There are ways, I think, I making the show ‘relevant’ that don’t include Buffy-izing it. And to be fair, Davies aims at and hits quite a few of those marks, too.

I have other nitpicks, however, including the fact that while the omnipresent CGI work has opened up vast new vistas in storytelling, it’s still rather hit and miss. Modern audiences, no doubt, prefer bad CGI to bad practical effects, but I’m rather old school, I’m afraid. Still, that’s purely a matter of taste. Admittedly, the practical effects even back in the ’80s run of the show were often wincingly bad, and the CGI never drops to that level, even at its cartooniest. Still, Doctor Who was never about the special effects, which may be part of why I feel the CGI is overused.

Still, unlike in the American pilot film, the vastly upgraded effects work isn’t used as a substitute for storytelling. And while there are mediocre episodes in the modern run, many chapters are terrifically good. Davies evinces a deep knowledge and obvious love for the show’s history. This is particularly manifest is the wonderful episode “School Reunion,” in which the Doctor is reunited with probably the most popular Companion ever, Sarah Jane Smith. (And wow, does actress Elizabeth Sladen still look good.) Sarah Jane ran about with both the third and fourth Doctors—the two best, or at least most definitive, ones—and remains the benchmark for the Doctor’s sidekick characters.

This brings up what I consider to be the most problematic aspect of the new run, however. The one thing that Davies really seems to have adopted from the American pilot film is the idea that the Doctor is, in fact, ‘romantically involved’ with this companions. Or at least the female ones, I guess. Maybe. Certainly the vast bulk of the Doctor’s companions have been females, anyway.

I *really* don’t dig this, however. I’m sure Davies would say “C’mon, we always knew the Doctor was boffing those assistants, don’t we?” Well, we always *joked* about it, anyway. However, actually having the Doctor romantically and physically entangled with his companions is…creepy. First, of course, because he’s another species. (Yes, I know, look at Star Trek. Still.) Second, because he’s not just picking up traveling companions, then. He’s picking up sex partners. Frankly, I thought the notion vulgar in the American movie, and am if anything less pleased with it now that it’s officially part of the actual chronology.

And isn’t the whole idea rather grossly exploitative? Good lord, the Doctor’s 800 plus years old, and he’s shagging chicks from another, rather less sophisticated planet who are often barely out of their teens? Yuck. I frankly don’t see much difference between this and, say, a Great White Hunter character from a hundred years ago who would bed an array of Nubians maidens and whatnot. OK, that’s a bit exaggerated of a comparison, but there is a kernel of truth there. Anyway, I’m sure Davies considers this more ‘mature’ and realistic, but again, the Doctor isn’t even human. Sorry, I prefer to leave Time Lord mating out of the equation entirely.

I should note that there are interior justifications for the idea that this in fact marks a change in the Doctor’s character, and that they aren’t necessarily retroactively casting all of the Doctor’s previous companions as lovers. For instance, the American film established the (simply gawd-awful) idea that the Doctor is, in fact, half-human. Since the film is again part of the cannon, I guess that remains true, although as far as I am aware there’s been no further mention of it. (And for good reason. Blech.)

Second of all, there’s the issue of the Doctor now being the Last Time Lord. In fact, to the extent I understand it, the Time Lords aren’t just all dead, but have basically been removed out of Time and Space altogether, so that they never really existed at all. (And they took the Daleks with them, except when the show wants to do a Dalek episode.) Except that other races remember the Time Lords, so…whatever. Still, there’s no doubt that the Doctor’s status as The Last, perhaps The Only Ever, one of his kind would have an incredible emotional and psychological effect on him. I’m just saying that I wouldn’t have filled this void by suddenly making him a sexual being all of the sudden.

Even so, at least Davies deals with these issues after raising them. In the aforementioned “School Reunion,” Sarah Jane and the Doctor’s current squeeze, Rose, circle around each other with the spitting hostility of an ex and a trophy wife stuck together at the same social function. Again, I really don’t think sex had to enter into it to make these scenes work, but still, it’s great stuff.

The episode is otherwise filled with nostalgic delights. The moment when Sarah Jane stumbles across the Tardis is a truly sublime moment for fans like myself. (And believe it or not, it’s actually great to see K9 again. The “We are in a car” scene is hilarious.) Sarah Jane and Rose’s attempts to one-up one another in terms of the adventures they’ve shared with the Doctor is also great stuff.

Still, it’s a particularly nice idea that Sarah Jane would also angrily resent the way the Doctor just literally dumped her back on Earth, without a word, after shepherding her around all of Space and Time.
Her recriminations against the Doctor really add a lot of meat to what could have been just a Joyous Reunion sort of thing.

A lot is made of the ‘ex-wife’ idea, and it pretty much all works. “You can tell you’re getting older,” Sarah Jane observes, “your assistants are getting younger.” And at the end, when the Doctor leaves her a new, improved K9 as a going-away present, there is bitterness mixed in with her gratitude. She says something to the effect of, “Here you are, upgraded and replaced. But then, that’s what he does.”

In fact, there’s a whole thread of sexual and romantic jealousy running through the show’s present skein. Rose Tyler, the Doctor’s present companion and lover,* basically herself dumped her somewhat stolid hometown boyfriend Mickey for the joys of gallivanting through Time and Space. Mickey unsurprisingly resents this, but really, how is he to compete? It’s like Mick Jagger sweeping into some bar and picking up a guy’s girlfriend right in front of him.

Because of this, though, it’s hard not to sympathize with Mickey’s satisfaction when Rose is confronted by the fact that she doesn’t occupy a truly unique place in the Doctor’s affections. Not only does she meet this “Sarah Jane” person (“You never even mentioned her!” she spits; which doesn’t make Sarah Jane very happy, either), but two episodes later the Doctor is inviting another budding romantic partner, and a rather more glamorous one, to join them on their journeys. Only a somewhat convenient set of events removes this direct rival from Rose’s path.

[*Again, though, how is this going to play out in the years ahead. Are we to assume that every future companion is the Doctor’s lover? Will the show devolve into a ‘will they or won’t they’ sort of thing? [Shudder.] Time will tell, but again, this is a might big can of worms Davies has opened. Maybe when they switch to the 11th Doctor they can regenerate that bit out of his new personality.]

Anyway, to sum up, all complaints aside I’m enjoying the new show quite a lot, although of course the quality of the show varies from episode to episode. (“The Idiot’s Lantern” chapter I found particularly lame.) I will say that I find the way Davies’ Doctor keeps bumping into characters from earlier episodes a bit weird, as if all of Time and Space were actually pretty small. And, of course, he tends to bump into beings met by his or Eccelston’s Doctor, not the prior ones, Sarah Jane notwithstanding.

Still, this is part of Davies’ modernization drive, for both good and ill. This includes creating an increasing dense Official Mythology for the show, and involves spin-offs, such as separate shows for the Torchwood Institute (an X-Files type bureau we see becoming increasingly enmeshed with the present Doctors’ continuity) and The Sarah Jane Adventures, a more kiddie-oriented show (as Doctor Who itself once was) for Sarah Jane.

I’ve seen the pilot for the Sarah Jane show—she had also previously had a pilot for another show starring her and K9*—and it was pretty good. A further series, set as the pilot was after the events of School Reunion, are due to hit airwaves soon. Because K9 is (perhaps) to be featured in a stand-alone cartoon show, apparently he will not be a regular part of Sarah Jane’s new program. That’s too bad.

[This was back in 1981 (!), and entitled K9 and Company, which makes Sarah Jane sound like K9’s sidekick rather than the other way around.]

I haven’t seen any episodes of the program Torchwood. With the Sci-Fi Channel and some local PBS station (a nice throwback, since it was PBS that ran the Doctor’s adventures here back in the day) showing Doctor Who, if the ratings are good enough, I imagine Torchwood (geek alert!—and anagram for Doctor Who) will make an appearance here.

  • turkish spock

    Torchwood is a very iffy show. Enjoyed it at the start, but that enjoyment swifty turned to annoyance, which then turned to disinterest.

    Season 3 of Doctor Who was the best one yet. It had its misses, sure, but its hits were up there with the best of Doctor Who. ‘Blink’ in particular was the most cleverly-written piece of sci-fi TV that I’ve seen in some time.

    And I agree with you on ‘Idiot’s Lantern,’ which is sad, because Mark Gatiss wrote one of the best Season 1 episodes, and so I had very high hopes for it.

  • Yeah, it’s not like Idiot’s Lantern was awful, but it stuck out as a subpar episode.

    And sometimes (read: almost always) political stuff works better as subtext. Word has it that Davies asked for the (entirely boring) family conflict subplot to be beefed up. If one of the results was the entirely cliche scene Any-Viewer-Could-Have-Writ-It-Himself scene where the son gives the big “You fought in the war against Fascists but now you yourself act like a fascist” speech then, yeesh, let’s hope he doesn’t ask for anything else to be beefed up in later episodes.

    For what it’s worth, I hear Gatiss was pressed for time when he wrote that script, and again, it may have been further sabotaged by Davies edicts.

  • Flakey

    Torchwood is more of a mix of Men in Black and Stargate. Surpress the news of aliens and gather up thier technology. Unfortunately after a good start they started throwing more and more “Desperate Housewives” in.

    Regarding the time remaining for the doctor. It was established as far back as Colin Baker that the “Master” was the 13th “Doctor”. Going to be interesting how they pull off that, unless they choose to ignore it entirely.

  • BeckoningChasm

    Explanatory Note: Just to put things in context, I have a huge Doctor Who fans as a kid,

    I didn’t know you had a kid (snark snark snark).

    I liked the new Dr. Who at first, but it doesn’t wear as well as the old stuff. And there is simply far too much Rose. The Doctor’s practically a supporting character, as we watch Rose do this, Rose get all huffy about that, Rose Rose Rose.

    And not to spoil it, but the ending of “Love and Monsters” (where the Dr travels through time and space just so Rose can harass a guy) bore this out. I can’t imagine any of the previous Drs indulging such a whim. (I rather imagine Pertwee, Baker or Baker saying something like “Oh come now, Rose, hasn’t your species inability to ‘forgive and forget’ caused enough damage to your civilization?”

    Having said that, the first season’s “Dalek” episode was outstanding.

  • Ed Richardson

    Tom Baker defined the role. Right place, right time. I wouldn’t even bother with the new one. I don’t get that “reboot” vibe from the lead actor, or the producers behind it. Doctor Who is not Buffy the Vampire Slayer. It’s a bit of Douglas Adams meets General Hospital.

    And yes Ken, I concur with your attitude about TV CGI. It’s the lesser of two evils. The BBC/SCI FI Channel and what have you in Cable Land simply lack the budget. I would rather old school Battlestar Galactica effects any day. But one must remember, that was a very expensive series and they used a lot of pre-shot stuff from the movie EVERY SINGLE EPISODE.

    Is there a science fiction series that anyone likes these days? Sorry to play the cynic.

  • Danny

    “Is there a science fiction series that anyone likes these days? Sorry to play the cynic.”

    Heroes? Lost remains popular. I’d call 24 a sci-fi show (albeit of the “twenty minutes into the future” variety

    In more clearly sci-fi, the new Battlestar Galactica is quite popular. Firefly, obviously. Farscape is also popular enough to be on TwoP, though I know nothing about it.

    I’d also recommend the semi-recent Cowboy Bebop (perhaps the only foreign show of any kind where I’d actually advocate the dub over subtitles). Even if you don’t like anime, it’s practically an American show, anyway.

  • Hecubus

    As I understand it, Torchwood will be debuting on BBC America this September. At least that was the last I heard.

  • fish eye no miko

    A few things:

    The Doctor has worn glasses off and on for years. The Fifth Doc occasionally slipped on glasses to read or examine thing closely just like 10 does.

    Second–I HATE HATE HATE the “Doctor’s companion falling in love with him” crap. And even worse, them retconning it so Sarah Jane seemed to be in love with him too… [headdesk]

    One change I like is the idea of the Doctor being the last of his race… it adds something to his character… Something I can;t quite describe, but I really like it.

    Something else: “I suppose they’ll say his eyes were messed up during his most recent, problematic regeneration.”
    Anyway, glad you’re enjoying the show. I’ve seen season three, and I like it.

  • Jimmy

    Being a huge fan of the original show, I watched fervently as a kid, I have mixed feelings about the new series. There are a lot of things I thought they have done right- the casting of the Doctor and his companions, the generally decent SFX, the right mix of new material and stuff from the old series but I have some pretty major gripes with the new series.

    As Ken mentioned the whole Doctor/companion relationship thing- although I’m not sure it was ever directly indicated he and Rose were actually doing the deed. The attempts to modernise the show with the inappropriate pop culture references etc, is also annoying. What I really take issue with is the earthbound nature of the series. Almost every single episode of the new series is set on earth, usually in the present day although each series has a couple of token historical set episodes. The few episodes set off earth have a tendency to be set on spacecraft or space stations, and even then are usually orbiting the earth or something. I’ve watched up tot the beginning of the third series on the new show, which they have just started showing in Australia, and the Doctor has yet to legitimately set foot on an alien planet- the closest being the ‘Satan’s Pit’ two-parter. He can travel through all of time and space, would it be too much to ask for to have some more outer space adventures? To actually see some other planets than earth? It is clearly a conscious decision by Davies to keep things earthbound. But with half the stories being set in the present day and with companions now keeping in regular contact with their friends and family everything seems far too cosy and confined. Obviously the show has always been largely set on earth but this new approach really limits the range of stories that the old version could do and feel very cloying for it. I was truly sick of the Tylers, including Rose, who was given far too much prominence at times, by the end of the second season. Hell, they even made a new back-story for the Cybermen so they originated on an alternate earth.

    Nerd moment- It was never established that the Master was the Doctors 13th incarnation. Flakey is probably thinking of the Valeyard, the villain from the ‘Trial of a Timelord’ storyline, who supposed to be a separate entity produced when the Doctor’s final regeneration went wrong (Or some thing like that- they never really explained it outside of an offhand remark.)

  • Sarah

    Rose isn’t the Doctor’s lover. Although they are clearly deeply fond of each other, they do not have a sexual relationship – indeed, in the excellent ‘Father’s Day’ episode (from Eccleston’s season) she exclaims ‘We’re not a couple! Why do people think we’re a couple?’ Later on, when Rose meets the dashing Captain Jack Harkness, the ‘psychic paper’ indicates that she considers herself single and ‘very available.’
    This doesn’t change in Tennant’s era. The relationship is quasi-romantic but definitely not sexual. I just want that cleared up.

  • I do think they pretty seriously imply that the Doctor and and Rose are now lovers. Technically, the show is still partly aimed at kids and they don’t get overly explicit about it. However, there are definite hints. When Sarah Jane refers to Rose as being the Doctor’s new assistant, Rose barks, “I’m *not* his ‘assistant.’ Sarah Jane then casts a sort of leering look at the Doctor and says, “Get you, Tiger!”

    With the Doctor for the first time shown snogging chicks–the fact that The Girl in the Fireplace quickly follows after School Reunion advances the prominance of this–I think it’s pretty obvious that they are intentionally sexualizing the character (certainly I’m not the only one to read it that way). Sarah is correct about Rose and the Doctor not being a couple at that stage of things, but I think they are clearly signally that is no longer the case.

    For what it’s worth, I grew up during the Pertwee and Tom Baker years, and rather like it when the Doctor hangs around Earth alot. It was nice seeing UNIT back, for instance. But I most definately agree with the comment about the show being made all mod and of today, as it were. Again, the Doctor should nothing else if timeless.

  • turkish spock

    I don’t necessarily mind the show being made mod and of today, because it pretty much kept up with times (or usually just behind them) during its original run, but I do mind that they make it of today by laying on one pop culture reference after another. I miss the days when the Doctor was more likely to refer to Huxley than Ghostbusters.

    Thankfully, Season 3 is a lot more Doctor-centric than the two Rose seasons were, and Tennant really rises to the occasion as a result. Not enough to put me in the ‘best Doctor ever’ camp (like anyone but Tom Baker could ever be the best), but enough to make me think ‘best Doctor since Peter Davison.’

    And there really is a dearth of good sci-fi TV right now. Battlestar has its moments of brilliance, but also its moments of taking everything far too seriously, inserting heavy-handed political allegory, and turning into nothing more than a soap opera in space. Heroes has potential. No interest in the various Stargate offshoots. Lost track of Lost and need to catch up.

    The upcoming SciFi Channel version of Flash Gordon, however, is shaping up to be, well, actually quite generic and bland. Which is a shame, really. If there’s one word that should never be associated with Flash Gordon, it’s ‘bland’