Box Office Report (07/02/09)…

The (comparative) summer BO doldrums continue.  We’ll just have to see if Transformers wakes things up, but I certainly wouldn’t count on it.  Especially giving the reviews.  Here’s the thing, you don’t have to make a good movie to make money (obviously), and making a good movie doesn’t necessarily mean it will make money (obviously).  Here’s the thing, though:  All other factors being equal, it never hurts to make an actually good film.  Think of how much money the, say, TriStar Godzilla film could have made if it were good enough to draw audiences back for a second showing.

That’s really what we’re talking about here.  Movies can make a lot of cash that first weekend.  However, the true blockbusters inspire repeat viewings.  When you love a movie so much on opening night that you talk it up to all your friends, and even tell them, “Let’s see it tonight; I wouldn’t mind seeing it again,” that’s when you got something.  I did exactly that, back in the day, with Raiders of the Lost Ark.  (Many of my friends on opening night had gone to see Clash of the Titans instead.  I organized a big group to see Raiders the next night.  It might be weird to think of it, but Raiders had a much lower profile on the radar than Titans did that opening weekend.)

The thing is, although the teen crowd will go out and see movies pretty reflexively, just to get out of the house and hang out with their friends, even there they can get worn down by seeing too many lame films in succession.  And I don’t think anything this year has really completely thrilled people.  Pirates and Spider-Man I think were generally considered better than average, but most of the rest of the summer slate this far has been pretty underwhelming.  Last weekend’s disastrous first-place opening for the inordinately expensive Evan Almighty was definitely a signal of that.

Things rebounded a bit this last weekend, but only to a certain extent.  Pixar again had the number one films in Ratatouille, which copped a healthy if not spectacular $48m this weekend.  (As opposed to last weekend’s first place film, Evan Almighty, which only draw about $31m.)  Even so, and despite spectacular reviews, that’s the lowest opening for a Pixar film since A Bug’s Life way back in 1998.  Even Cars drew $60m its first weekend, much less than the roughly $70m drawn by both The Incredibles and Finding Nemo.  

Still, Pixar’s movies generally have pretty good legs, and there’s no doubt the film will do well, if not astoundingly well.  And they do tend to do well overseas, so nobody should weep for them or anything.

Second place went to the fun and generally well-received Live Free or Die Hard, which reaped a solid $33m over the weekend, and nearly $50m since it opened during the mid-week.  Again, action films do well overseas, and Willis is still a name to be reckoned with in foreign markets.  Die Hard With a Vengeance, for instance, made a stupefying 72% percent of its worldwide take overseas.  So all in all, the latest (and second best) chapter in the John McClane saga should do well, especially given its comparatively modest $110m production budget.  (Which, amazingly, is a good $65m to $90m less than the cost of Evan Almighty, depending on whose figures you trust.)

Speaking of, Evan fell two spots to number three, drawing about $15m.  That’s not a huge drop-off these days, down about 52% from last week, but that first weekend was soft.   With $60m stowed aboard, this might strike land at about $100m at best, and remember the studios will only get about half of that figure.  Again, for a movie that cost $175-200m, plus prints and advertising…youtch.  Not good.  And it’s hard to imagine it drawing all that much overseas, either.  This pretty much has to be considered the summer’s biggest bomb so far, and will probably keep that crown by the time fall rolls around.

I don’t mean to harp on Evan’s huge production budget—oh, yeah, I guess I do.  Good grief, Die Hard 4 cost only $110m, and even Transformers cost $150m.  Admittedly, Spider-Man 3 ($260m) and Pirates 3 ($300m) cost even more.  However, each of those films is going to draw nearly a billion dollars at the worldwide box office. 

The much more modestly budget spook movie 1408 dropped a nice soft 49%, and scared up another $10.6m.  That gives it a pretty solid $40m so far. 

Fantastic Four 2 banked another $9m this weekend, for a blah $115m so far.  Again, overseas grosses should help, but like the first movie this will be (at best) a modest moneymaker.  They really screwed the pooch on this series, I think.  Thank heavens that the people behind next year’s Iron Man seem so much more on the stick.  Suggestion:  If they bother making a third Fantastic Four, and I’d say that was dicey, dump director Tim Storey, who hasn’t really brought much to the table for the first two films.

Pretty much the only big comedy this summer, Knocked Up fell only 32% to deliver another $7.5m, for a total of about $122m.  Of course, since the production budget was $30m, they made some major coin with this already.

Ocean’s Thirteen made about $6m, for a domestic total of $102m.  It’s also made another $125m overseas.  Still, for a film with that many stars, this is a middling result, although it made more than the second film. 

Pirates 3 looted another $5m, down only $30 from last week.  It should cross the $300m line domestically pretty soon, and has drawn a boggling $900m plus worldwide.  Given this, it has passed Spider-Man 3 as the year’s biggest earner (and which fell out of the top ten this week).  Still, with that film making $880m so far, I don’t think they’re really that concerned.  Shrek 3 also fell out of the top ten, but has already made over $500m worldwide, and has yet to open in a lot of foreign markets.

All in all, given the big three ‘3’s this year, the summer has been up a goodly amount over last year, over 30% in fact.  However, things seem to be quieting down, so we’ll see what the final summer figures are like once fall arrives.

  • BeckoningChasm

    “Transformers” (at today’s IMDB) is getting pretty good reviews, actually–most of them of the “dumb, but very entertaining” variety.

  • Gundamhead

    Have to say, I’m sick of blockbusters. I haven’t bothered seeing one in the theaters for a long time, and the stuff they’ve been putting out for the last couple years ain’t gonna change that.

  • BC–

    Oops, I just saw the Chicago reviews. Transformers is getting a 64% positive rating at Rotten Tomatoes, which isn’t spectacular but which is, indeed, fairly decent.

  • El Santo

    I’m just stoked that “Ratchet” made the cut on the Transformers roster. That was the first Transformer I ever owned! I kept thinking: “Well, Ratchet was a pretty crappy toy that looked nothing like the cartoon, and even on the cartoon he was hardly ever on the air, so they’ll probably give the slot to that blowhard Ironside.” But nope… he’s there! I’m not a fan of the new toys, but I’m thinking of picking up a Ratchet action figure just for old times sake.

    And yes, I do have the 20th Anniversary Optimus Prime posing majestically at my desk at work. Why do you ask?

  • Gareth

    Its been gratifying to see that Transformers and Live Free have done well. Both are unreconstructed Big Dumb Action films in an eighties sort of style which I’ve always thought was the best era for these sort of movies.

  • Jimmy

    Unfortunately I found “Transformers” to be in the dumb but not that entertaining category. Too long, much lame comedy and what should have been spectacular SFX sequences ruined by shaky-cam and frenetic editing. I’m wondering if I saw the same movie as everyone else. Contrastingly I saw the much maligned “Fantastic Four; Rise of the Silver Surfer” over the weekend as well and found it far more satisfying- a breezy, entertaining (And short- thank god!) movie in a summer of overlong, overstuffed and overwrought blockbusters.

  • Another Voice

    Its a shame Ratatouille didn’t do better. It really is a great, GREAT movie. Hopefully, it’ll pick up some decent earnings over the holiday and show some legs.

    Then again, there weren’t a lot of kids when I went and the ones that were there were laughing hysterically at the short before the movie and completely silent through Ratatouille itself. I don’t know if that’s a good sign or what. The movie doesn’t have a lot of stupid gags and doesn’t have that buddy-movie dynamic most Pixar movies have. So who knows. Personally, I’d like to see a lot more Ratatouilles than Cars or Finding Nemos.

  • hk6909

    I don’t expect Transformers to be a gigantic success. After all, when I found out they hired Optimus Prime’s original voice actor I figured they were mostly making the movie for the grown-up kids who first watched it 25 years ago. But I’ll go see it, and I’ll probably weep for how much the world’s changed.

  • Eh, Transformers was basically after my time (same with G.I. Joe).

    Now, when they get around to making a Herculoids movie…

  • BeckoningChasm

    I think if they made a Herculoids movie, I’d just find out how much it would cost to live in the theatre during its run there. And I’d sit in the front row, night after night.

    It’s a shame about the Transformers action sequences being all shaky-cam and stuff. If I were to make a movie with robots punching each other, I’d want people to see them punching each other.

    But then, it’s Michael Bay. When the characters in The Island made it to the top of the mountain, and the camera is spinning and cutting and the landscape is spinning at the same time, I just stared slack-jawed at how majestically stupid the whole scene was.

    I can’t imagine Michael Bay directing for the stage. His head would probably explode at how immobile everything is.

  • Ed Richardson

    One thing we all know for sure: Transformers will be vastly more engaging than Tarantino’s Death Proof. It will also be more enjoyable than Fantastic Four 2. In all likelihood, it will will outclass Spiderman 3 and it’s a given it will blow the latest Pirates outing completely out of the water in terms of entertainment value.

    So say what you will…long, mindless, awkward. Most will agree it’s better than all of the above and given the tens of millions (nay…hundreds) spent on those flicks, Transformers will be the summer’s strong point. I would go just for three of the effects sequences I’ve seen in the trailers. Bay sets the standard for CGI. Not even Peter Jackson comes close.

  • Patrick Coyle

    Contrary to my normal moviegoing behavior, I’ve actually gone to see four top-billed movies so far this summer – the three “part 3s” thanks to having a family who wanted to go check them out at the drive-in, and Transformers, just because I wanted to. What’s surprising is that Transformers is the only one I wouldn’t mind sitting through again, which will be the first time since the first Shrek, and Fellowship of the Ring.

    When it comes down to it, Shrek the 3rd was funny, but just didn’t feel like it had any substance, Pirates 3 was only entertaining when Johnny Depp was on the screen (ditto for 2, and probably 1), and Spider-Man 3 just seemed to drag on and on with the drama. After thinking about it for a while, I wondered if a whole lot of fat could have been trimmed off by removing the whole Sandman plot and just had Peter temporarily go to the dark side while battling the new Goblin in a two-front war – fighting in the streets as their alter egos, and fighting over Mary Jane as themselves, before facing off together against Venom. I don’t know… just an idea.

    Transformers is the only one of those movies that kept my interest the whole way through, lagging only with a lump of exposition in the middle. And while I’m not at all a fan of Michael Bey (or shaky-cam), I have to say that you shouldn’t worry about the director being too “over the top” when you’re dealing with giant shapeshifting robots from space.

  • “Transformers will be vastly more engaging than Tarantino’s Death Proof.”

    I think Mr. Richardson needs a time out.

  • hk6909

    I don’t know about timeouts, but even I, the biggest nostalgia freak in the world, am waiting to see the movie before I pass judgment.

  • Ed Richardson

    I saw Transformers last night and today again. It destroys anything out there and I can tell you all with 100% certainty that the movie sets a new standard in CGI. King Kong doesn’t come close. Gollum from LOTR doesn’t come close. The Matrix doesn’t come close. This movie sports a ton of CGI sequences that absolutely blow your mind. The computer models’ movement and shading integrate seamlessly with the live shots they are designed into. It is nothing short of jaw-dropping. None of it looks like CGI, it looks real. This is the kind of CGI everyone has been waiting years for. This is it. It looks absolutely real and in this movie it’s done on a grand, grand scale. The battle royale near the end of the movie is worth two price of admission. Ditto for the highway duel between Optimus Prime and a Decepticon that transforms into an industrial truck with a loader arm. You guys have all seen where that robot skates along the highway and tears through the middle of a bus. That’s just 1% of this tremendous action sequence. There are 14 in the movie.

    Megatron and Starscream are just awesome.

    So, with this movie, WETA takes a back seat to ILM for CGI and let me just say, that’s a distant second place. ILM spent 38 hours on each frame of this movie! I just read that the managed to make the shading so realistic because their computer models were programmed using several photographs taken from the set when the live action was shot. When you see what I’m talking about, you’ll get it.

    Forget the storyline. You’re going to this movie to see things like two giant robots duking it out and falling through a freeway overpass and rendered to such a degree of realism that you feel like you’re seeing it on the news. It is that good.

  • Danny

    If I want pretty GCI, I’ll play Final Fantasy X. Better plot and characters, too.

    Who cares how nice the CG is, if you can’t even see any of it over Michael Bay’s rampant ADD?

  • Ed Richardson

    Comparing the CGI in a video game with that of this movie is inane. Final Fantasy X didn’t cost 150 mil. More processing power went into 30 frames of Tranformers than did into every XBOX 350 game combined. That I can guarantee you.

    Frankly, ILM’s work in this movie makes Weta’s Kong look cartoonish. Thank the fates they’re doing Iron Man.

    And I could care less about Bay’s signature schmaltz and shaky hand-held camera shots. No one else is going to show you two giant robots plowing through a skyscraper as they try to kill each other. The effects in this movie are the benchmark now. In this regard, it’s not really a Michael Bay film, but more like an event film, as Independence Day and The Matrix and perhaps Jurassic Park were. You walk out of the cinema thinking “Man, the effects in that movie were mind blowing.” This is not The Rock or Bad Boyz II or Pearl Harbor. Yes, it’s a Michael Bay film but he didn’t want to do the movie in the first place and had no interest in the Transformers prior to Spielberg talking him into doing this movie.

    Somehow it just all worked out and the people at ILM just delivered the absolute best CGI in CGI’s short history.

  • Jimmy

    Are you on a comission from ILM or something?

    The problem I had was the shaky-cam prevented me from seeing these wonderful, oh so wonderful SFX very clearly when they were on screen. And yeah, it makes a difference to me what was on screen when the SFX weren’t taking centre stage. If they had trimmed the fat from the movie, mainly the comedic material with the teens and the slapstick with the transformers and actually shot the SFX scenes in a way that was more watchable I might agree with such a positive assessment of ‘Transformers.’

  • Ed Richardson

    No, I don’t work for ILM and I’ve always considered their CGI second rate to Weta. I just give props where they’re due, and the ILM people who worked on this deserve massive kudos.

    Running time: what can one say? This is how mega-summer meatball movies are now. Return of the King was bloated and half an hour too long. Ditto for King Kong. Matrix Revolutions dragged. The Hulk ran way too long. I can think of a dozen 100+ million dollar summer movies where this is the case. I think it all began with Titanic but I’m not sure.

    Regardless, Transformers feels pretty lean for it’s bulk because things keep moving. Even tho critics slam the “unfunny” funny parts the truth is they are funny. The shaky hand-held shots are disorienting but I found myself liking it more the second time around. It drops you right in the action if you let it.

    As movies about giant things go, this is the best of all of them for the current era. I would never count the original King Kong or Godzilla because moviegoers then probably regarded the stop-motion Kong as much a mind-blowing effect as much as I do the CGI in Transformers. But Jurassic Park, the (atrocious) Godzilla remake, and Jackson’s Kong pale in comparison to what you see here.

    I really enjoyed the violence in the movie too. I’m so glad they went w/ a PG-13 rating. Scores of people get smashed and crushed in this movie. Sure, there are no lopped off heads or blood, but the massive violence is there nonetheless. My favorite scene in the entire movie is when Optimus Prime is fighting on the city streets and sort of flips over the heroine to avoid crushing her and it’s shot from her perspective in slo-mo and she screams thinking she’s going to get crushed. Awesome, super-talented shot.