Superhero Movies: The Watchmen

Zack Synder*, the man currently trying to bring the long-in-development film adaptation of Alan Moore’s Watchmen to the silver screen (a project I just can’t see working—the source material is just too complex and dense to cover in two to three hours), at least sounds sane. 

[*Snyder is the director of the soon to be released and very weird looking Spartans movie 300, which is also a comic book adaptation.  Should that film take off in a major way, and the buzz at least is good, Watchmen could take a sudden shift into production overdrive.  There’s even some saying the film could be in theaters by late next year, although that seems pretty unlikely for me.]
He says one advantage of the long wait for it to get made (if it does) is that it makes setting it back in 1985 (and before) more likely.  That’s the proper setting for the story, since it has a lot of Cold War resonance and involves Viet Nam and Nixon and such like.  Snyder says, however, that the studio was iffy about the setting when it was just, at that point in time, the very recent past, and wanted to update it to what was then the present day instead. 
Now that the mid-’80s is twenty years ago, apparently the ‘period setting’ thing strikes the studio suits as less weird. 

Synder also likes the setting as he feels it will keep the film, were the setting updated to the current day, from being seen (as much, anyway) as a comment on the current war on terror.  “‘Oh Zack,” he is quoted as imaging being asked, “what do you think of the war on terror? What’s your take on it?’ Who gives a f*ck what I think about the war on terror?”  Who indeed?  Man, if only more people in Hollywood took that attitude. 

Synder also wants to only use CG as necessary, which admittedly might be a lot, but which is still another point in his favor.  However, the fact that he envision the film as “more Taxi Driver than Fantastic Four” really proves he gets it.  (Although this shouldn’t be hard to figure out, as perhaps the main character in the comic sounded A LOT like Travis Bickle.)

  • Altair IV

    I just recently re-read the series after many years, and it truly is a masterpiece, one of the greatest stories ever put down on paper.

    I definitely agree that it’s just way too much for a single film to depict. I can’t imagine anyone, no matter how much they “get it”, being able to pull it off.

    I believe a lot of the strength of the Watchman series comes directly from the comic book format. The non-linear storytelling, the unforgettable visual style, the ability to get inside the character’s heads, and last but not least, the (very important) supplemental material at the end of each issue…I don’t think any of that can be translated to the screen without losing something in the process.

    To be honest, I’m hoping this is one movie that never gets made.

  • Fox Cutter

    Forget the silver screen. Let’s let HBO do it.

    Seriously.

    Think about it. A 12 hour mini-series, one episode per a chapter of the story. You get different directors in each one, helping to better capture the feel of each chapter (such as the symmetry of issue 5, or the disjointed style of Issue 9) and the time to really cover all the material.

    If you get a good producer, and some directors who really love the series, you can come up with a translation to the small screen that is just as iconic as the original, even when it’s different.

    I think it’s the best of all worlds.

  • Ken HPoJ

    FC, I agree with you utterly. Like Dune, a mini-series seems the natural medium (if there is one) for a Watchman adaptation.