The box office goes to the dogs…

(Did you see what I did there?)

A flood of movies came out on Christmas Day, fortuitously (for Hollywood) occurring on a Thursday this year and allowing for a long weekend.

As a further sign that ‘stars’ don’t matter much in today’s movie marketplace, the number one movie of the weekend featured two ‘b’ or ‘c’ level celebrities (Owen Wilson and Jennifer Aniston) and, much more importantly, a big cute dog. Marley and Me, adapted from a popular book—I should know, I work in a library—dug up a whopping $37 million bones—see what I did there?—for a nifty $10,000 plus theater average. That was the weekend take, by the way. On Thursday it made about $15m more, so it’s total stands at $51m plus. That makes the film a hit already, since you have to assume it cost a lot less(by tens and tens of millions of dollars) than many of the weekend’s other releases.

The rest of the weekend’s movies were majorly star-driven. The number two film was Adam Sandler’s special effects kiddie movie Bedtime Stories, which drew (since Thursday) a healthy $38m plus. Reviews were tepid, but aside from Marley and Me it was the big family oriented flick, and thus drew that audience.

Brad Pitt’s The Curious Case of Benjamin Button got much better reviews, and a bit higher per theater average, and even just a tad more than Bedtime Stories over the four day period. However, over the Fri-Sun frame it drew less, indicating (unsurprisingly) that the kid-friendly Bedtime Stories will have better legs. More important, Benjamin Button cost a whopping $150m to make—which doesn’t include advertising and prints—and which is probably four or five times what the more successful Marley and Me cost. Even so, while not a home run, Button’s $39 four day take for the weekend isn’t bad. It just needs to do well overseas, and time will tell whether the film’s fantastical plot has universal appeal. Button also drew the weekend’s best reviews, although it’s Rotten Tomatoes aggregate was still just a fairly good 73%.

Tom Cruise’s Valkerie actually did pretty well. Yes, it came in four place, but it drew a robust $30m, and it’s $75m production budget was half of Button’s $150m. One imagines it’s WWII setting will sell it well overseas, as well, so things look mildly rosy for star Tom Cruise’s slow climb back to respectability.

Jim Carrey’s Yes Man, a veritable remake of his own (massively more successful) Liar, Liar, added another $16.5m this weekend, for a two week take of nearly $50m. Comedies do well on home video, so assuming they kept the budget within sane limits (it remains unannounced, though, so who knows?), the film is doing OK, if not great.

Will Smith has taken a severe tumble for the first time in a long time, and the world’s one legitimate film star might be finally paying the price for a string of highly mediocre pics such as I, Robot, I Am Legend and Hancock. You can get away with that crap for only so long of a time. Moreover, Seven Pounds drew scathing reviews (27% at RT), generally be accused of being highly pompous. For me, the problem was that I figured out what the film’s ‘mystery’ concept was the very first time I saw a commercial for it. Even so, the film’s fairly cheap budget (about $55m) means that the $40m it has drawn in the States over the last two weeks will probably be enough, with at least some overseas monies*, will keep it from losing money. Still, Smith might actually want to make sure his next couple of movies are actually good, assuming the bloom isn’t already off the rose for him.
[*I’m hoping the film hasn’t been released in many overseas territories, since it’s current reported foreign take is about $27,000.]

The week’s one real turkey was the dreadful-looking Frank Miller pic The Spirit. It drew a woeful $6.5m this weekend, for a four day take of around $10m. Considering what a travesty this looks to be, the result seems entirely just.

  • Blackadder

    I’m also a librarian and my reaction to Marley and Me is, essentially, that someone needs to drill a hole in John Grogan and let some of the sap out. Mitch Albom and Nicholas Sparks need the same treatment. Still, Marley and Me might be a cute movie, if you have kids.

  • Actually, I’m not a librarian (don’t have a MLS), but I do work in a library. And I’m not saying it’s a great book, just a popular one.

    One thing I love at times like this is when people come in get the book and are TOTALLY BEWILDERED that the book is checked out. I’m not kidding, this happens every time. Apparently the thought that other people would react in exactly the same way as they are–seeking to read a book a newly released movie is based on–completely stuns them.

  • Lawyer Ku

    The title of “Marley and Me” reminds me of another movie – “Mac and Me”. Hopefully, it’s better.

    When are we getting a review of that? (*chuckle*)

  • Mac and Me stands as the worst thing I’ve ever seen in a regular theater. Man, that thing sucks.

  • Blackadder

    House of 1000 Corpses was the worst thing I ever paid to see in a theater. I still want Rob Zombie’s head for that one. Mac and Me is pretty dire too though.

    Are the MLS people at your library really touchy about the title of librarian, Ken? I can’t say getting an MLS was any great thrill for me, although scrupulous honesty forces me to mention it did double my pay. I agree it’s amusing that people are always shocked that books with movie tie-ins are checked out – Stephanie Meyer’s teeny bopper soft core vampire books are a good example right now. We bought tons of extra copies of the whole series and we can’t keep them on the shelves. Well, at least people are reading.

  • Just one day last week I must have personally dealt with four or fives moms looking to score a copy of Twilight (or an earlier book) for daughters coming home for the holidays, and being somewhat surprised or even a bit ticked to learn that all our copies were out. And we own like 30 copies of Twilight.

    That’s another lesson: If your kid is assigned a book to read over the summer along with the rest of his or her class, don’t come in two days before classes start and get annoyed because other kids have checked out our copies of the book.

  • Joe1

    Does anybody notice that most Will Smith movies have promising starts but have horrible 3rd acts? I really liked I Am Legend until the very phony looking CGI zombie/vampires showed up to ruin it. The 1st 40-45 minutes of Hancock are very funny, with Hancock as a jerk, but the stupid twist with Charlize Theron, lame bad guys & an even lamer ending had me thinking “What were they thinking”. Judging by Seven Pounds’ box office, I wasn’t the only one who’s been burned by Mr. Smith’s movies.

  • JoshG

    I remember seeing Mac and Me as a kid and thinking it was ok, but than again I really liked the Ewok movies as a kid so I don’t know. I’ve never really been known for my good taste anyway.

  • fish eye no miko

    Ken said: “Mac and Me stands as the worst thing I’ve ever seen in a regular theater”

    DAY-AM…

    Joe1 said “I really liked I Am Legend until the very phony looking CGI zombie/vampires showed up to ruin it.”

    Dear God, that was some of the worst CGI I’ve seen in a theatrically released movie in some time. Couldn’t they just get ya know… ACTORS? in make-up?

  • Plissken79

    Marley and Me was a fun film, and suprisingly unsentimental at parts. Enough with the John Grogan hate here, he could have very well left out the sections dealing with Marley’s fate but choose not to

  • John Nowak

    I really need to staret buying the collected Eisner’s Spirit — the appeal of the comic is very hard to explain. Panel to panel, it ran from melodramatic to slapstick, and somehow made it all work.

    Although I have not seen the film, the trailers were off-putting enough that its failure almost makes up for the relative success of The Day the Earth Stood Still. Almost.

    I suppose this makes me a bad person.