No Need for Speed…


The summer has already seen its first major bomb, and Marvel Comics must be crossing itself and saying, “There, but for the grace of God…” I never really thought the fact that Iron Man was “second tier” superhero would hurt that film, because even “first tier” superheroes are mostly known by the general public from previous movies and TV shows. The questions are a) does the general premise strike mass audiences as interesting, and to a lesser extent, b) does the movie look good.

With Iron Man, the answer to both questions was yes. The same with last year’s Transformers, and the for the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, which were probably the hugest Hollywood gambles we’ve seen in the last twenty years, other than the Lord of the Rings movies.

Not so much for Speed Racer. What causes it to stumble? Maybe nobody was really that interested in seeing the cartoon brought to life. Maybe people just aren’t that thrilled with the Wachowski Brother past the first Matrix. Maybe—and I wouldn’t underestimate this—even parents who considered taking their kids to see this were scared off when they heard it meant they also would have to sit through what was clearly an insanely frenetic movie for a ludicrously long 135 minutes. In any case, it didn’t take.

Indeed, it will be interesting to see the final box office figures later today. The ones that come out on Sunday for the late night and Monday morning news shows are in fact estimates, calculations of Sunday’s takes based on how films did on Saturday and Friday. These are generally roughly accurate—although Iron Man slipped a few million from the estimates last week—but sometimes a studio will fudge figures a bit to stave off embarrassment. The general public mostly hears the estimates, not the revised figures, so in terms of face-saving this can be at least a bit effective.

Here the issue is whether Speed Racer was even the second place film. If the estimates stand, it’s reported take of $20.2 milion will have beat the lamely reviewed (it has a 27% positive rate at Rottentomatoes.com, as opposed to Racer’s slightly more robust 35%) It Happened in Las Vegas by a paltry $200,000. In other words, by the end of the day we may very well learn that Vegas in fact placed in the box office race this weekend, leaving Racer in the lowly show position.

Even if Racer retains second by a hair, Vegas still is easily the winner in the larger sense. It made more per theater (an estimated $6,200 to Racer’s 5,600), and, oh yeah, cost about a forth as much and undoubtedly spent less on advertising and, obviously, prints, since it’s in less theater. Vegas’ budget was reported at $35 million, Racer’s at $120 million. And again, the later has had a much more lavish promo budget. Vegas at this point will definitely make money, whereas Warner’s and the Wachowski must be hoping for a gigantic overseas take for Racer. We’ll see. It certainly seems like something that would do well in Japan.

All this makes Marvel very happy, as their first self-financed film Iron Man jetted away with another $50.5 million this weekend. Now standing at a very ritzy $177 million, this should cross the $200 million mark perhaps by Friday, and if not, certainly after next weekend, even as it inevitably falls to the next chapter in the Narnia franchise. Iron Man’s take was down about 49% from last weekend, which these days is a pretty decent hold. Indeed, most films held well. Iron Man also made about $100 million overseas in its first week; no figures for this weekend are available yet. It should be noted that Iron Man only cost about $20 million more than Speed Racer to make.

Following Vegas’ (maybe) third place finish was another romcom, Made of Honor. The distaff My Best Friend’s Wedding RSVP’d $7.6 million in its second frame, and currently stands at about $26m total. Meanwhile, the stork delivered the fifth place to Tina Fey’s Baby Mama, which in its third weekend made about $5.8m, for a $40m total.

The rest of the top ten went to Forgetting Sarah Marshall ($3.8m/$50m total); Harold & Kumor Escape from Guantanamo Bay ($3m/$30m); The Forbidden Kingdom ($2m/$48m); Nim’s Island ($1.3m/$44m) and Redbelt ($1.1m/$1.2m). Prom Night followed close after that, but with a robust—given its cheapie budget–$42m total.

  • BeckoningChasm

    The whole Speed Racer thing just passed me by, I admit. I know some folks were excited about it, and I’m glad for them (it wouldn’t bother me if it was a smash hit, either), but I had absolutely no interest in it whatsoever.

    The problem with anything designed to appeal to a cult is that the cult is typically way, way overestimated in size.

  • Terrahawk

    I was baffled by the entire Speed Racer enterprise. First, the cartoon is over 30 years old. I barely remember seeing it as a kid. Second, after the mediocrity that was the second Matrix film and the total stupidity of the third, why did someone think giving the Wachowski’s another big budget film was a good idea. Third, did no one learn from the Batman films that neon worlds really don’t interest people. Finally it sounds like the foul language is used closer to a PG-13 level and some of the violence might not really be PG level either.

  • I used to know a guy at work who’s a big Speed Racer fan (has a Mach 5 model at his desk and everything). Too bad I’m at a different location; I wanted to hear about his take on the movie.

    Does anyone know of the movie did really well overseas? I imagine that the anime is more popular in other countries (Japan, natch, but I’m guessing pretty much the whole Asian region).

  • Ericb

    I guess the failure of Speed Racer means we won’t be getting a 3 hour epic Pokemon movie in 30 years. Damn.

  • Terrahawk:

    About the third Matrix movie: weren’t Reloaded and Revolutions filmed back to back? I remember them being released in the same year. In that case, the money had already been thrown around for both movies at the same time, so there’s no time for the studios to suddenly put brakes on the cost.

  • Danny

    “Not so much for Speed Racer. What causes it to stumble?”

    Well, the cartoon’s a bit too old to get the nostalgia effect from the 18-35 year olds, and the more modern remakes never really took off here

    But mostly that it’s an F-Zero movie in disguise, only without the Falcon Punch. There was an article in Popular Science about how they had to use CGI to make the sets unrealistically bright. How did they think that was a good idea? Speed Racer never took place in the far-off future to begin with. If you liked the cartoon, you’d not be thrilled with the movie for randomly changing everything. If you didn’t, you wouldn’t be interested in the first place. And either way, the movie seems to be visually annoying.

  • fish eye no miko

    I was excited about the SP movie is at first, but the more I hear, the leerier I get… I’m really gonna have to think hard about whether not not to see it Especially given its length.. I’ve seen way too many movies whose stories–even if they’re good–do not justify their length. There’s filler or an ending that goes on and on. I’m wiling to bet that this will be SR’s problem (well, one of them)

    I think if I spend any money at the movies this week, it’ll be to see _Iron Man_ again.
    “Oh, let’s be honest, this is not the worst thing you’ve ever caught me doing…”

  • Terrahawk

    Yeah, they were made at the same time. I’m just saying that both films were at best mediocre and as such it seems foolish to let the one-hit-wonder brothers helm another major project at this point.

    From what IMDB is saying, it did poorly overseas as well.

    The trailers for the film turned me off right from the start. I just get the impression that there wasn’t a clear vision with what they wanted the film to be. A clear vision doesn’t spell success, but a lack of one almost always signals failure.

  • John Nowak

    I should have been the target audience for Speed Racer since I loved the show when I was … oh, three or five. But unlike Thunderbirds I’ve never been particularly sentimental about it. I mean, the idea of seeing the Mach 5 doing a jump off its jacks in a $120 million effects film amuses me, and based on that alone I might consider watching it. So put me down not “excited to see it” so much as “Well, maybe.”

    I’m in a minority, because I didn’t appreciate Matrix, not even the first one. I don’t particularly want to open up that can of worms, because I do not have any great insights about it. So, I’m not a fan of the Wachowski Brothers, although I have no particularly strong feelings against them. Still, seeing that they’re associated does take the bloom off, turning “lukewarm interest” to “Meh.”

    The advertisements looked bad, like a video game I didn’t particularly want to play, and finally, the word of mouth and critics were just devestating.

  • John Nowak

    Oh, forgot to mention this point: Ken’s right. The comic book audience is, at best, a test audience for concepts and is a trivial component of the film audience.

    If the 40,000 or so people who read Iron Man: Director of SHIELD each went out and saw Iron Man five times each at, oh, $10 a ticket, then the comic book buying audience would be about as important to the film as the ticket sales in Chile.

  • Hicksion

    On the subject of: ‘Warner’s and the Wachowski must be hoping for a gigantic overseas take for Racer…’

    Speed Racer is virtually unknown in Europe – in fact I’m not even certain it was shown..( here in the UK at least ) if it was, it never gathered the following of other US cartoons etc.
    Perhaps the Japanese will lap this frenetic, bombastic multi-coloured mess up?… or perhaps I’m just not giving them enough credit.

  • Johnny

    Someof you keep talking about Speed Racer being known or unknown as if that really makes a difference. No one knew 300 outside of geeks, and no one knew about Iron Man. Audiences just rejected the concept and look of Speed Racer, I’d say.

  • Johnny: I agree with that, and made the same point in the next post after this. I really think the whole ‘pre-sold’ idea is increasingly untenable. I still think this film would have done a LOT better if it had been 90-100 minutes long, rather than 135 minutes.

  • Adam Lakeman-Turner

    It was shown in the UK at some point. I (at 23 years old) can vaguely remember it. Never really grabbed me though.

  • The Rev. D.D.

    I never had a chance to see the show until adulthood. I couldn’t really get into it. So I am not the target audience.
    However, even if I was, I don’t think I’d be down with what they’ve done as far as the movie goes. All that neon color and the futuristic-looking sets…a far cry from the show to say the least.

    What were they thinking, honestly?