At the Movies: Inception

Before I went, I thought I would jot some quick notes on this film, which I saw last weekend. First, it is so rare now to see such a well-made movie, especially an expensive Hollywood one, that I was a tad shocked. However, any lingering doubts that The Dark Knight was a fluke on director/writer (with an emphasis on the latter) Christopher Nolan have officially been dispelled. And this is from someone who never really was a huge fan of Leonardo DiCaprio. He can act, certainly, but he’s just never been one of ‘my guys.’ He’s quite good here, though. (Speaking of my guys, Michael Caine has what is basically an extended cameo in the film, but damn, it’s always good to see him.)

Nolan’s smartest concept, which the film is based on really, is that you can enter various layers of dreams, each of which moves at a faster timescale than the previous one. This allows for the long climax of the film, in which the characters run around on FOUR different levels of dreamscape, including one that is really just an old-fashioned Bond movie.

Nolan does an amazing job here, both as a writer and director. In terms of the later, he ably manages several things that would sink nearly every other director. The film is seemingly 80% exposition, because there’s so much stuff to establish, and yet is never for a nanosecond even remotely boring or even uninteresting. Indeed, as most of you will know, my most general complaint about modern film is that movies now are almost invariably 20 to 40 minutes too long. Well, Inception is 2 and a half hours, and damn if there is a gram of fat on her. Most films are overlong now not because of their length, but because they are longer than they need to be. Inception is EXACTLY as long as it needs to be.

Speaking of things that would sink a lesser director, not only does Nolan have to shift focus from one of the four realities to the other to the next during most of the film’s last hour–and without once confusing the viewer–but one of the levels involves what is basically a Mythbusters-style physics thought experiment in how you achieve a certain physical effect in weightless surroundings. Kudos to Nolan for making this plot thread just as interesting as the ones with shooting and stuff. Indeed, he’s smart enough to know that these scenes, while themselves really, really fun, also afford the audience a necessary breather between the more frenetic stuff. Amazingly, Nolan has figured out what has eluded nearly every other action movie director these days; that each scenes should be designed to integrate in service to the whole film, and not just stuff so much action and crap blowing up as to exhaust the audience before the next scene starts.

Christopher Nolan is the man James Cameron, for all his success, must secretly wish he were. May he continue making movies for a long, long time.

Anyway, feel free to use this thread to discuss this or any other recently seen movie.

  • BecckoningChasm

    I fully intend to see this when it comes to DVD, but I find it hard to sit in a theatre that long. (This from the person who was awake during all of B-Fest, yes.)

  • Mr. Rational

    Absolutely right, Ken. There hasn’t yet been a better film all year. I have been on record already (with my friends) that if the end of the year rolls around, and I still think “Inception” is head and shoulders (or pert, or suave) above the competition, and yet it doesn’t win Best Picture — that I will never watch the Oscars again, because they will be without meaning.

    The shame of it is that I have a very good friend whom I know would just LOVE the ideas in, and complexity of, “Inception.” And yet I can’t recommend the film to her, because two of her relatives died in a horrible train crash, and so there are a couple moments in the film that I’m afraid would traumatize her. So she’s been hearing all these great things from everyone, but has my official word to “hold off until it’s on DVD and we can get you through those moments.”

  • alex

    I was very impressed by The Dark Knight and I can’t wait to see what Nolan will do for the third film (I’m a lifelong Batman fan). He will also produce the next Superman flick.

  • Toby Clark

    “However, any lingering doubts that The Dark Knight was a fluke on director/writer (with an emphasis on the latter) Christopher Nolan have officially been dispelled.”

    You mean there are people who had those doubts even after Memento, Batman Begins and The Prestige?

    Christopher Nolan is now my absolute favourite director and I cannot wait to see what he does with the DCU next.

  • Gristle McThornbody

    Loved (and still do) Memento, thought The Prestige was great, am in the minority (seemingly) in that I do think the Dark Knight was overrated. Inception, though, was simply fantastic.

  • alex

    What impressed me so much about The Dark Knight is that it was more than the usual superhero movie while completely being one at the same time. I think Nolan pulled this off because he understand the Batman character and did not feel above the material. There was no ‘Big Director Complex’ as Ken once referred to Coppola doing his Dracula film.

  • alex

    They are many analysis of the Dark Knight movie online I just wanted to mention two that really aspect of the film that really got me. One was the fact that the Joker was not after anything in particular (money or power) he simply wanted to bring Gotham down the gutter. After so many superhero films where the vilain always have a big gimmick it was refreshing to see the Joker being so dangerous and unpredictable because, to paraphrase Alfred, he just wants to watch the world burn.

    The other aspect that really impressed me was the ending scene when Batman takes responsibility for the crimes of Harvey Dent. He becomes more than a hero by doing this and saving the faith that people have in Gotham. Nolan gave Batmn a nobility he had for a long time in the comics but never onscreen.

  • silverwheel

    I, too, was surprised at how elegant the script was, considering that so much exposition was required. And it’s warmed my heart that a film as loopy as this cleaned up at the box office. Nolan is currently in the most fecund individual stretch of cinema since classic Spielberg.

  • I guess I am out of step again, because Batman’s acceptance of the crimes of Harvey Dent really rubbed me the wrong way.

    Every time I see a movie, and some aristocratic, elitist numbnuts decides that “the people” simply can’t handle the truth, so it has to be kept from us, I am mightily irked. It is the one persistent sore in my watching of ITV’s “Primeval” series. At least they recognized this problem in the second series.

    But to me not even Batman and Commissioner Gordon have the right to decide what I should and should not know, based upon their theory about how I would act. Grumph.

  • alex

    Batman’s decicion to take responsability for Harvey’s crimes was to prevent the Joker from destroying the faith people had in the few honest public figures left in the city and also partly out of guilt. He tries to switch place with Harvey at one point saying ‘Gotham needs a hero with a face’ while he plans to retire the Batman persona and take away Rachel from him. Batman is human after all and not perfect.

    Are Batman and Gordon right or wrong to hide the truth about Harvey? I think it was the right call. Nothing is to be gained by exposing what Harvey did (plus he was half crazy when he did it) and Batman is strong enough to take the blame. As he says ‘I’m what Gotham needs me to be’. That being said I understand the opposing view on this.

  • I understand why Batman did what he did. I just overwhelmingly disagree with his logic.

    His argument saying that it is better for people to believe a lie than to know the truth. Furthermore he is saying the he, Batman, gets to pick which lie they should know. I say it’s spinach and I say the hell with it.

  • Rock Baker

    Hmmm. Until now I didn’t notice how much The Dark Knight resembles The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

    And people do need heroes. Sometimes the need for such trumps reality and people refuse to accept the truth (Babe Ruth, FDR, and JFK spring to mind). But if something gets out it can do irriversible damage to someone (J Edgar Hoover wasn’t a crossdresser and Lady Godiva didn’t ride nude through town, but the dirt sticks and people have their perceptions changed forever). I’m not saying keeping something ugly under wraps is completely right, but there are cases where it seems best to let people have their ideals. People need ideals so they have something to aspire to, it seems cruel to me to destroy an ideal should it serve no purpose. It’s a complex issue, to bo sure.

  • The Rev.

    We’re going to try to catch this next weekend. This review on top of the others I’ve read pretty much seal it.

    I finally caught Scott Pilgrim this past week, and what a hoot that was. I liked even it better than Kick-Ass, which I enjoyed, mostly because it didn’t have any sudden mood switches into utter darkness. It was a video game come to life, and I really dug it. I’ll have to pick up the graphic novels soon.

  • Reed

    Nolan is a director that I enjoy on a first viewing, but his work does not hold up for me on repeat showings. Except for Batman Begins; I thought it was ridiculous from the first viewing.

    I think Dark Knight is extremely overrated. I enjoyed watching it, once. It’s a fantastic looking movie, and any time Heath Ledger’s (sp?) Joker is on screen it’s absolutely riveting. Except for the final fight between Batman and the Joker; I thought it was a really lame way to end an otherwise quite good segment. It has some good drama, and then it throws in things like the excursion to Hong Kong that are totally unnecessary.

    While I had not thought about it specifically in those terms before, I totally agree with Sandy re: guy in cape deciding what’s good for the public.

    I enjoyed Inception, but there are several things about it that fall short for me. The big one being the role of the female lead. I can’t remember her name, but I’m talking about the one they hire to be their new “Architect”. Every action her character takes seems totally unmotivated for me. Well, that’s not entirely true, if she doesn’t have her frankly offensive level of personal space busting curiousity we can’t follow DiCaprio’s full plot. That doesn’t really do it for me.

    So yes, it was an amazing looking movie that I enjoyed once. I don’t think I’ll be watching it over and over again.

  • People need heroes. But they need real heroes. Why can’t Batman or Commissioner Gordon be their real hero? How awesome is it going to be for Gotham City when someone finds out the truth about Dent?

    Lies < Truth every thing IMO.

  • Plissken79

    Inception was a terrific movie, one of the most creative I have seen in a long time. Let’s hope Christopher Nolan gets the Oscar he should have received for the Dark Knight

    Glad to hear you liked the film Ken, I gave up the Liberatas website due to Jason Apuzzo’s endless and tiresome rants about how he hated the film

    On another film note, The Town was a very good film as well, Ben Affleck is not always an effective actor, but he has showed great promise as a director