Wheee! Music Box showing Metropolis in June…

On June 4th Chicago’s Music Box Theatre will start a week’s run of the newly refurbished print of Fritz Lang’s silent science fiction masterpiece Metropolis. I’ve been reading about how spectacular it’s supposed to be, so I’m very pleased it’ll be showing here:

Seldom has the rediscovery of a cache of lost footage ignited widespread curiosity as did the announcement, in July 2008, that an essentially complete copy of Fritz Lang’s METROPOLIS had been found.

When it was first screened in Berlin on January 10, 1927, the sci-fi epic ran an estimated 153 minutes. After its premiere engagement, in an effort to maximize the film’s commercial potential, the film’s distributors (Ufa in Germany, Paramount in the U.S.) drastically shortened METROPOLIS. By the time it debuted in the states, the film ran approximately 90 minutes (exact running times are difficult to determine because silent films were not always projected at a standardized speed).

Even in its truncated form, METROPOLIS went on to become one of the cornerstones of fantastic cinema. Testament to its enduring popularity, the film has undergone numerous restorations in the intervening decades. In 1984, it was reissued with additional footage, color tints, and a pop rock score (but with many of its intertitles removed) by music producer Giorgio Moroder. A more archival restoration was completed in 1987, under the direction of Enno Patalas and the Munich Film Archive, in which missing scenes were represented with title cards and still photographs. More recently, the 2001 restoration—supervised by Martin Koerber, under the auspices of the Murnau Foundation—combined footage from four archives and ran a triumphant 124 minutes. It was widely believed that this would be the most complete version of Lang’s film that contemporary audiences could ever hope to see.

But the world of film preservation is not governed by the laws of wide belief. In the summer of 2008, the curator of the Buenos Aires Museo del Cine discovered a 16mm dupe negative that was considerably longer than any existing print. It included not merely a few additional snippets, but 25 minutes of “lost” footage, about a fifth of the film, that had not been seen since its Berlin debut. The discovery of such a significant amount of material called for yet another restoration. Spearheading the project was the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung (hereafter referred to as the Murnau Foundation), which controls the rights to most of Lang’s silents and is the caretaker of the legacies of many other German filmmakers, including the one after whom the foundation is named. Film Restorer for the Murnau Foundation, Anke Wilkening coordinated the endeavor.”

Also, they’ll be featuring George Romero’s 117th zombie movie, Survival of the Dead, the week before. I am SO excited. Really. I can hardly sit still, when I think just how MUCH I loved…whatever was like his third zombie movie ago. The one with Dennis Harper.

  • Reed

    Huh. I hadn’t heard about this at all. In a way I’m excited, but in another way I think that Fritz Lang had a tendency to go on and on and freakin’ on long after he had thoroughly nailed a point home and I have a hard time imaging enjoying 2 1/2 hours of Metropolis! If it comes to Dallas I might check it out anyway.

    I had no idea that Romero had squeezed out another zombie movie either. I actually kind of enjoy Land of the Dead in a mindless fun kind of way. Diary of the Dead, on the other hand… I miss the good old days where Romero had to fight for funding and thus was forced to fight for his ideas. Where does he get the money now? Can I blame Uwe Boll for funding Diary of the Dead? That would have a certain twisted symmetry.

  • Rock Baker

    I have the Goodtimes VHS release of Metropolis, it runs about 90 min. I think. This may be considered a damning statement, but I felt the film was overlong as is. Yes, its visually impressive (confusing at times, tho that may be due to the cut footage) and important in film history, but I can’t say it left much of an impact on me. I’m sure that places me in a fairly small minority of genre fans.

  • I’m not sure about that, Rock. And yes, as I noted in my Dr. Mabuse the Gambler review, Lang really liked to work long in his silent days, often making films lasting four hours or so. Even so, Lang directed M, a film that quite possibly would make my 20 Greatest Films of All Time list. And I love the Dr. Mabuse films, and…

  • Rock Baker

    Much to my shame I must admit I haven’t seen M yet! Oh, it’s on the list, I just haven’t had the chance yet.

  • BeckoningChasm

    Dennis Harper FTW. I like Metropolis, but it’s not easy to watch on a regular basis. The acting is consistently way over the top, proudly in the school of “milking the giant cow.”

    Land of the Dead was okay, but very simple-minded. Diary of the Dead was terrible, aside from one good line–something about, “See, I told you fast zombies wouldn’t work!”

  • GalaxyJane

    Oh glory! I have been dying to see this version since it turned up in Brazil. Actually for longer than that, just didn’t expect it too ever turn up. Don’t suppose this’ll be wending its way to Fayetteville any time in the next decade though. My personal hope is for a great DVD release before too much longer.

    I was surprised at how much the basic storyline had been altered when the film was cut, the 2001 restoration was RADICALLY different from the version that had been floating around on my old VHS print. Rock, you might be surprised and discover you liked it, it’s nearly a whole different film. OTOH, you might not, I have a possibly pathological affection for silent film.

  • I must confess to my secret sin, namely that I actually prefer Diary of the Dead to Land of the Dead. But I love Metropolis straight through.

  • Marsden

    I hope they release Metropolis to DVD, I’d really like to see it, I never have, just clips on shows here and there.

  • Rock- Re: M, you won’t be disappointed. It’s a genuinely great film.

  • The Rev. D.D.

    I haven’t seen M OR Metropolis. Or any of Romero’s zombie movies after Day.

    I’ve not wanted to see Metropolis in its truncated form, but I have no excuse for the others.

  • GalaxyJane

    Rev, if it helps I haven’t seen any of the Romero flicks after “Night”. Admittedly it’s because I’m still having nightmares from that one a good 24 years after first catching it on my local “Shock Theater”. Yes, I am a complete chickensh*t about zombie films, thanks. Ooh, and not much taste for nihilism either.

    From what I have heard about the steadily declining quality of Romero’s product over the years, maybe I should watch them all in order in hopes of a cure.

  • The Rev. D.D.

    I, on the other hand, love zombie movies almost as much as giant monster movies, so I really don’t have any excuse for it. I’ve watched much worse zombie movies than his last two are supposed to be (hell, I OWN worse than them), so I need to get on it now that I’ve seen just about all of the 80s Euro-zom movies.

  • What’s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & help different customers like its aided me. Great job.