Oh, for the love of Pete…

It’s being reported that the initial cut of Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious Basterds runs two hours and forty minutes.  There have been terrific long war movies before, like The Great Escape, but seriously, Mr. Tarantino, not every movie you work on needs to be this epic length.  Even the unedited longplay version of his Grindhouse contribution Death Proof (which I’m apparently fairly rare in liking quite a bit, at least in the original configeration) ran nearly two hours.

I’d like to be proved wrong here, and to go see this and just be blown out of my chair by it.  And to be fair, the original The Dirty Dozen, the film Basterds is clearly based upon, itself ran two and a half hours.  Still, Taratino may find it a wise investment of his time to for somebody whose job it is is to occassionally tell him ‘no.’

  • Ericb

    It’s ironic that while we are often told that our culture, particularly youth culture, suffers from short attention spans that so many movies nowadays are so long.

  • Joe11

    I agree that Tarantino definitely needs somebody (or some bodies) to tell him no. Death Proof featured a lot of conversation & dialogue scenes that go nowhere & do nothing to advance the plot. When you listen to the main women characters talking endlessly in the diner & car about car chase movies, it doesn’t sound like those characters are talking, its more Tarantino showing off his knowledge of 70’s pop culture.

    Maybe Inglorious Basterds will be better since Tarantino obviously can’t use the pop culture cliches. As long as the movie is entertaining, I don’t care if its 2 or 3 hours long.

    Give Credit Where Its Due:

    David Carradine’s “Superman” speech to The Bride in Kill Bill 2 is great cause it does feel organic to Carradine’s character & it explains his actions against The Bride in both movies.

  • Grumpy

    Pulp Fiction – 2 hours 34 minutes
    Jackie Brown – 2 hours 34 minutes
    Kill Bill vol 1 & 2 – 4 hours 7 minutes

    Q likes the leisurely pace.

  • Well at least Mr. Tarantino has some chops – while perhaps his movies coudl be edited further, I have not yhet been bored by them.

    You are not alone in liking Death Proof, Ken, though I have not seen the extended version (which admittedly might try my patience).

    I will always have a soft spot in my head for Mr. Tarantino after listening to his commentary on From Dusk Till Dawn. George Clooney is onscreen, and Tarantino kind of lackadaisically says, “Yeah George was okay.” But he spooges all over Fred Williamson, dripping with hero-worship and adulation. The man’s heart is clearly in the right p lace.

    There is not a single SECOND of celluloid that could be excised from the Dirty Dozen -by the way every frame of film.

  • I really do like Tarantino, but I fear he’s like that certain kind of quirky film maker who’s bag of tricks eventually gets played out. Think David Lynch. His love for the long form seems to be paying diminishing returns (like Sandy, I’ve avoided the longer Death Proof).

    He loves ’70s genre films, I just wish he’d learn something of their efficiency. Again, I’d love him to make a Larry Cohen-esque ’70s style Luke Cage movie. But I wouldn’t want on two and a half hours long.

  • I have to say, I’ve never loved Dirty Dozen, which I admit is strange since I love most of the other Great Man movies like Zulu or Naked Prey or The Great Escape.