The obligatory bitch about Comcast post…

Ah, now it’s officially a blog.

This is actually a fairly minor bitch, but still.  I never got cable because I spend a lot more time (surprise) watching DVDs and doing reviews and stuff.  Yes, yes, I do still do reviews, now and then, smartass.

Anyhoo, my trailer park used to provide a free line with the local channels, and that was good enough.  However, then we went from Unc’l Bob’s Cable TV to Comcast, and the free line was dropped.  Well, I grumbled in an old man sort of way, but wanted *some* sort of TV, so I went ahead and signed up. 

Needless to say, I took the expanded six-month bargian deal, especially because it allowed me to watch the majority of Cubs game this year, which are telecast mostly now on Comcast Sports.  However, I tried to resist getting their On-Demand Service, which requires a special box.  However, you couldn’t get the offer without the box.  So I knew trouble was ahead, to be fair.

Now the deal is over, and the standard package is $54 a month, while the very basic is $19.  Obviously, given the amount of TV I watch, $35 extra bucks is fairly crazy, and that’s, sadly, fairly real money for me.  So I called to drop down the service.

However, since I have the On Demand box, which I never wanted and tried to resist, I’ll have to have a guy come out to remove it–$20 charge, ching ching–and waste an afternoon of vaction time.  However, since the change is worth about $400 a year, I’m going for it.

The lady obviously tried to get me to stick with it, but it was merely a brief mention towards that and their other services, so it wasn’t obnoxious. 

She also said, however, that basic is just the local channels.  Maybe.  However, their website say for my area the basic package includes the handful of stations I actually watch (barring the Cartoon Network, and their shows come out on DVD eventually anyway).  This includes the Discovery Channel, so I can still watch Mythbusters.  Even if the website is wrong, and I do just get the locals, I’m again not paying $400 a year to watch Mythbusters and Iron Chef America. 

We’ll see how this works in the future.  I’d like to ramp up my service 6 months a year to get the baseball stuff.  However, if I call in April and they’re all like “OK, but you have to have a guy come by,” then I won’t.  C’mon, why isn’t that just a tossing a switch from headquarters things?  And if going back up *requires* me in particular to get the On Demand box put back on (and then off, and then on, etc.), then screw that entirely. 

I realize that Comcast doesn’t owe me total flexibility.  But here’s the deal.   If it’s as easy as it should be, I’ll pay $55 a month for cable six months of the year, and $19 the rest.  If not, then I’ll pay $19 a month for cable all year long.  We’ll see which works out. 

  • silverwheel

    Boo Comcast! I dealt with this same issue a few months ago. Basic cable used to be the first 100 channels, and I got rather hacked when I had to upgrade to a digital box just to keep the same level of service.

  • I figure cable TV actually saves me money because I watch or record a lot of movies on TCM, IFC, and On Demand instead of renting or buying the DVDs.

    Anyway, that’s how I justify it to myself.

  • Scott —

    I can see that. For me, though, it makes more sense (assuming I had more leisure time than I do now, to start with) to upgrade my Netflix membership than pay for more cable channels. And if the basic *does* include the channels the website indicated–as opposed to the ones the operater indicated, i.e, no cable channels at all–then that’s just about 90% of everything I’d want anyway.

    I would like the Cubs games next year, but again, that depends on what is involved in upgrading my service again next spring.

  • Fox Cutter

    Usualy Comcast’s basic package has the local channels any the educational channels (which is usualy is Discover Channel). Though to be honest I watch so little TV anymore I would just cancle it if it wasn’t for my roommate.

  • Pip

    Cabel TV is such a scam. I want to be able to pick-and-choose ala carte what channels I get, and just pay for those. Send me a menu, let me choose, then turn those channels on and charge me $X. I don’t want Telamundo El Salvador, the Stained-Glass Network, Used Car America, Tattooed Tramp TV, or the BuyRCrap Network.

  • Pip– Yeah, I’ve been saying that for years. Once we get past the local monoply stage for cable companies, and that will happen sooner or later, the first company to offer that sort of thing will clean up.

  • fish eye no mikof

    “A la carte” cable (picking and choosing which networks you want) sounds like a good idea, but as it is now, cable companies can carry the smaller networks because of money from some of the bigger channels. In fact, many times, the networks come packaged, so you get some of the smaller networks WITH the bigger ones. If you go ala carte, each network would cost more per unit then they do now. If you get enough networks, you’re not that much better off, price wise.

  • Terrahawk

    The problem though is they don’t even offer packages in the same form as they get them. In other words, if they get TNT, TBS, and CartoonNetwork as a package, why can’t they offer that as one choice?

  • fish eye no miko

    Terrahawk said: “In other words, if they get TNT, TBS, and CartoonNetwork as a package, why can’t they offer that as one choice?”

    What do you mean “as one choice”?

  • Eric M

    We’ve got Time-Warner here in my neck of SoCal.
    Not too bad so far. TV? Never touch the stuff.
    But my wife really wanted the TV setup. I really
    wanted the high-speed broadband, which she could
    care less about. Win/win!
    Now if I could only decide which new console I
    want to purchase for half-an-arm, I’ll be set :D

    Oh, and cable a la carté would be awesome beyond words.
    It would all depend on the pricing.
    Sure, I’ll tack
    on a buck for Sci-Fi, Comedy Central, or somesuch.
    Heck, I’ll even pay 5¢ for MTV2.
    (Yes, that is a sarcastic commentary on “music television”)

  • Tork_110

    Let me once again remind anybody who listens to me why I HATE THE SO-AND-SOs SOOOOOOOOOO MUCH!

    Oops, wrong kind of blog. Sorry!

  • Here’s a National Review Online editorial against current efforts by social conservatives and consumer groups to impose ala carte cable through federal regulation.

  • Terrahawk

    NRO leaves out one major point. Cable companies are monopolies. Even though there are satellite options, geography and weather them those choices. That means that most people are stuck with whatever cable company has the monopoly in their area. We aren’t dealing with a free market and I don’t see how it is trampling on contracts to say that when the current contract expires you cannot enter into a bundling agreement. Finally, there are probably people who don’t want to pay for religious programming just like I don’t want to pay for MTV, etc.

  • Without having read the article, I’d say just generally that efforts to get the government involved in this sort of thing are almost invariably wrong. About the only pressure on the government should be for them to remove the constraints on the market that they have already put into place; mostly the installation of local monopoly of cable TV providing.

    Past that (which is really just pulling the government out of a situation in which it has already inserted itself), the market should be allowed to do its work.

  • fish eye no miko

    Ken said: “Past that (which is really just pulling the government out of a situation in which it has already inserted itself), the market should be allowed to do its work.”

    Except there is no “market” in a monopoly, which is what most cable companies have.

  • That’s what I’m saying. Pressure the government to remove itself from the process, as it did by creating the monopolies in the first place (which, after all, were created via legislation), and then let the market do its thing.

  • The Rev. D.D.

    Too bad about your troubles with Comcast. We had them years ago and never had any complaints. In fact, their “On Demand” system featured a channel from the fine folks at Something Weird. They always had a few 10-minute trailer batches, some 5-minute burlesque type shows (usually featuring Betty Page and friends), various little things like they usually include on their DVDs, and one or two movies–all of these for no extra charge.
    We watched some horrible movie I cannot recall the name of (maybe “She-Freak”?) that went from turgid Girl in Gold Boots-type “woman strikes out on her own to find fame and fortune” crap to excruciating lust triangle to Freaks-esque revenge drama, culminating in one of the worst make-up jobs I have EVER seen and an oddly cruel little denouement that came with a Bible verse superimposed on the screen.
    Then they left the area and we got switched to Time-Warner, who have no Something Weird and some of the worst customer “service” I’ve ever had the misfortune of dealing with. We’re getting away from them as soon as possible, they’re been such a nightmare.
    OK ramble over!