More thoughts on Doctor Who, Season 2…

Contains some slight spoilers about Season 2, so beware.

 

Well, I’ve gotten to the end of the ‘second’ season of Doctor Who, and my enthusiasm has slacked off just a bit.  Many of the comments you guys made on my last post on this subject proved prophetic.  I had noted that I liked David Tennant more than Christopher Eccleston, but as some had noted, he did wear on me a bit over the entire season.*  The Doctor should be eccentric, to be sure.  However, I really don’t need him to be so overwhelmingly wacky all the time.  Tone it down a notch, would you?

[Admittedly, this was probably aggravated by me watching the episodes in clusters over a short time period, rather than one a week as they were televised.  However, this is the age of the DVD, and producers are going to have to be aware of that.]   

I think part of the problem is that the two strongest episodes by far (School Reunion and The Girl in the Fireplace), by my estimation, ran back to back in the first half of the season.  They were followed by a pretty good two-parter (Rise of the Cybermen and Age of Steel), an outrightly lame episode  (Idiot’s Lantern), an ‘eh’ two-parter (Impossible Planet / Satan Pit), a sadly misfired comedy episode (Love and Monsters), a truly bad episode (Fear Her), and finally a pretty good climatic two-parter (Army of Ghosts / Doomsday) that featured a fanboy fantasy plot idea (although too good, really), including a BIG SURPRISE that was sabotaged by the print art on the actual DVD disc.  [!!]  Thanks!  Thank goodness I wasn’t actually able to enjoy the surprise!

In other words, there was definitely a sense of diminishing returns after my two favorite episodes early one.  And things that didn’t really bother me, or slightly bothered me, grew increasingly irksome.  Again, the unceasingly wackiness of Tennant’s Doctor was one of them.  Another was the whole relationship with Rose, something that frankly threatened to take over the show.  I was pretty glad to see the back of her following the season ender, frankly, and hopefully the emo Doctor (streaming tears—ack!!!) is a thing of the past in the third season. 

The Doctor’s companion is an important character, but this isn’t Love Story, for heaven’s sake.  A little more, or a lot more, reserve would be greatly appreciated.  And please, lay off the pop culture stuff.  Do you realize how badly that’s going to date these shows in the years ahead?  A lot more than the primitive special effects of the older shows, I’ll tell you that.

More interesting than Rose, frankly, was the growth of Mickey as a character.  I loved the (again, minor spoiler) where he shows up in the final two-parter, waving mischievously at Rose when she hadn’t even noticed him.  By this time Mickey has gotten to the point where he’d be a much more enjoyable companion for the Doctor than Rose grew to be. 

And frankly, enough with Jackie, too.  And Rose’s Dad, dead and alive.  And Torchwood.  Again, more than the fact that the season was fairly Earth-bound (as noted before, my favorite era of Doctor Who saw Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker basically repelling invasions of Earth for UNIT), what created a sense of narrative claustrophobia for the show was the attempt to create an inter-connection mythology and recurring cast for the show.  The constant background references to Torchwood and Bad Wolf just became too clever by half, in my estimation.  Let it go.  There were some real good things to come out of this approach, undoubtedly, but I found them overwhelmed by the bad as things progressed.

And another problem with attempting this newer, more modernist type of continuity is that it ignores the many former versions of the Doctor.  Suddenly, because of special effects advances, the Daleks can fly.  OK, makes sense.  However, how is it that every Dalek the Doctor now meets is a flying Dalek?  He travels in time, doesn’t he?  Why doesn’t he occasionally come across the old, non-flying Daleks?  More pertinently, why didn’t the older Doctors ever come across the flying ones? 

Maybe there’s a convoluted explanation in that particular case, involving the Time War, but this issue applies in other areas.  We see all these people on the Internet researching the various appearances in history of the Doctor (makes sense), but all the images they have accumulated show one of the two newer Doctors (doesn’t make sense).  Good grief, Pertwee and Baker’s Doctors were more or less  stationed on Earth for years, and all over the place.  So somebody will find pictures of the Eccleston or Tennant Doctor from a hundred years ago, but no pictures of Baker from thirty years ago?

As for Love and Monsters, it was an episode I really wanted to like.  Guest star Marc Wallace I knew and liked from the fun conman show Hustle.  (Check it out.)  However…it just didn’t work.  A little background.

Back in the ’90s, some popular sci-fi shows, especially The X-Files and Star Trek: The Next Generation, took a real artistic flier by doing the occasional humor show.  This sort of playing around with a show’s essential tone was actually pretty nervy at the time, and there were fears that the hard-core fans wouldn’t approve.  Instead, they loved them.  As long as a show didn’t ‘break character’ for comedic effect, fans simply adored these episodes.  When a much irritated Worf complained , after Q put the Next Generation cast in a Robin Hood reality, that “I am not a Merry Man!”, it was completely in character and hilarious.

The thing is, though, that those shows were essentially quite serious, and the humor lied in seeing normally reserved and essentially dour characters, like Fox Muldar and Captain Picard, in funny situations.  However, since the Doctor is (especially now) so often wacky to start with, Love and Monsters doesn’t really present enough of a tonal shift to really catch fire.   There are laughs here, of course, but the show has to be *too* wacky to be wackier than the show normally can be anyway.  Stargate: SG1 can still profit from that sort of episode.  I’m not sure Doctor Who can, at least given the show’s current tone.

What does work is the way the Doctor and Rose are kept off-camera for the great majority of the show.  We see the effect that Doctor has on ordinary people, and it’s very interesting.  This is the sort of experimentation with form I’d really like to see more of.  Some of the best Star Trek: the Next Generation episodes went outside the box:  Seeing the cast from the viewpoint of junior officers, actually initiating First Contact with a planet unaware of other civilizations in space, Picard learning to speak with an alien Captain with an initially incomprehensible language while trapped on a planet. 

In fact, I always thought Next Generation really missed a bet by not trusting the fans.  I always thought as the years went along, and they had established some credit with us, that they should have tried new things.  Especially, I’d have liked to have seen the occasional episode where *gasp* there was no danger element.  Spend an hour with the character interacting over a poker game, or exploring a new planet.  In fact, why not only have five or six danger episodes a year, so that the situations had more impact?  Next Generation might have pulled that off, I think, but nobody was willing to roll those dice.

Anyway, I’m generally enjoying the new Doctor Whos, don’t get me wrong.  There’s a lot of good stuff there, and only the occasional real clunker of an episode, which is nearly inevitable.  Still and all, a bit more of that British Reserve and Stiff Upper Lip, please. 

  • turkish spock

    You’ll be glad to know that Tennant tones it down quite a bit in Season 3 and brings some more gravitas to the part, plus there’s a lot less comedy overall in Season 3.

    It’s interesting to see that your opinions on Season 2’s episodes are nearly identical to mine, with one exception: I loved the Impossible Planet/Satan Pit two-parter. Fear Her, however, may just be the worst offering of the revived series so far, and how was it not just The Idiot’s Lantern revisited? Having too episodes so similar in one season was a bit too much. Love & Monsters…enjoyed the first half or so, until the monster showed up, then it lost me completely.

  • The real problem with the monster in Love & Monsters was that it was basically (as played) Fat Bastard from the Austin Powers movie as an alien.

    There was some nice stuff in the Satan double bill, but nothing that set me on fire. And some of the cooler stuff, like the guy walking around in the void, I’ve seen before (Creature, I think). Neat, but not new.

    Pertwee actually had a show like this one set on Earth. I think they referenced it in the episode.

    Yeah, Fear Her was pretty awful. It started out as a redo of the It’s a Good Life episode of Twilight Zone, and went downhill from there. I didn’t even notice the similarities to Idiot’s Lantern (perhaps because I used the FF button with a heavy hand during that episode), but you’re spot on.

  • bravesirrobin

    Impossible Planet/ Satan Pit not do anything for you? I’m surprised as it is not only my favourite episode in series 2 but possibly my favourite story in the entire revamped dr who (tied with either the empy child/doctor dances in the first series or blink in the third) and in fact one of the best peices of tv the BBC has done in terms of drama/sci-fi ever. Particulrly the opening as the tension builds and you start to peice toether what’s happenning. geuss going in there knowing the next title is the satan pit spoils it a bit but watching it on tv was an amazing experience.

    And yeah its similar to the daemons but the threat feels larger and the build up is superb. Plus the Ood look fantstic.

    But other than that, yeah general agreement. New Earth is crap with too many new elements in competition, Tooth and Claw is solid but not terrific, School Reunion was a lot of wasted oppotunities, the character interaction stuff was great but the plot devices (a code to the universe and aliens that borrow bits of dna) were interesting and totally underutilised. The Cybermen 2 parter was solid but not spectactular, girl in the fireplace was very impressive, the idiot’s lantern had some nice visuals (the faceless people freaked me out, particularly the grandma) and the wire’s performance was good but its a crap plot and not a great episode overall, fear her was total crap and similar to idiot’s lantern and features a horribly soppy ending but again some nice visuals and some creepy moments (love the drawing of the dad when it starts to come to life) and the stuff with the man fro the council was very funny.

    Peter Kay turn as the absoraloff was not as funny as kay can be and the oral sex joke was frankly waaay too disturbing for the tone.

    As for the ending? fanwank that made no sense but everyone enjoys a little fanwank (you are better at only one thing. dying. is a classic line)

    as for flying daleks well daleks did fly occassionally towards the end of the last series and the daleks the dr keeps encountering all remember the time war, as a tiem travelling race presumably the dr can’t go back and meet non-time travelling/flying daleks, they don’t exist anymore

  • fish eye no miko

    turkish spock said: “You’ll be glad to know that Tennant tones it down quite a bit in Season 3 and brings some more gravitas to the part”

    I think part of this has to do with having an older, more serious companion. Now if they can do away with the f&-#ing Love Story crap (they even dragged Jack into it for Rassilon’s sake…), the new show will be just about perfect.

    “plus there’s a lot less comedy overall in Season 3.”

    True. I do much prefer the third season.

    The thing that bugs me is… I LIKE Rose, but she started to dominate the story so much, with her issues and her boyfriend and her G-D family that I just wanted her to GO AWAY. I wasn’t glad to see her leave because I hated her, but because then the show could become “Doctor Who” again, and not “Rose and Her Time Traveling Friend”.

    Ken said, re “Love & Monsters”: “What does work is the way the Doctor and Rose are kept off-camera for the great majority of the show. We see the effect that Doctor has on ordinary people, and it’s very interesting.”

    This happens again in season 3 (“Blink”, the fourth-to-last episode; the last three episodes comprise a three-part story). I think it’s *much better* than “L&M”. It’s a good deal more serious, and I find the main characters much more likable than the ones in “L&M”. I actually wouldn’t mind seeing Sally Sparrow again. ^_^

    Now we just have to wait for the S3 release so you can review that… ^_^

  • Jimmy

    Damn, I pretty much agree with everything Ken said down to his individual rating of episodes as well. Although I liked the first half of the Satan’s Pit two-parter but the second so much, even if it did come across as an ‘Event Horizon’ ripoff. ‘Fear Her’ was pretty bad, the stuff with the 2012 Olympics made me want to hurl although I probably liked ‘Love and Monsters’ less. Bad comedy is always the worst thing to watch and I found it sickenngly twee. Though the twist in the season finale I hadn’t actually had warning of so it actually a cool surprise for me.

    That reminds, there’s a series 3 episode on tonight- best remember to tape it. It looks like it has a cat-man wearing Biggles gear.

  • fish eye no miko

    Jimmy said: “That reminds, there’s a series 3 episode on tonight- best remember to tape it. It looks like it has a cat-man wearing Biggles gear.”

    If you’re watching it on SFC, that’s next week (“Gridlock”). This week is “The Shakespeare Code”.

  • Dillon

    The Doctor’s just going to betray the time Lords to Voldemort, you know. (Yeah, that’s a thinker, huh?)

    Oh, and come on, Ken. A Cybermen episode that isn’t fan-freaking-tastic? I havent seen much of the 10th Doctor’s business, but that just sounds implausible. I’m sure it was the “Dalek” of the season.

    Ken’s got love for Darmok. Neato. We’ll of course have to make a complex metaphor for this situation, though…

  • Jimmy

    No, I’m watching on Australian TV. Although I missed this week’s episode and may have to obtain it through ‘other means.’