Whatever, dude…

Weekly Variety has yet another front page story on how the travails of the industry are finally hitting (gasp) the talent. Few writers except those at the very top benefited from the recent strikes that will result in a derth of movies next year. Apparently this lesson was learned by working class actors who recently resisted being bludgeoned into their own strike by people like George Clooney and Sean Penn, the sort of millionare stars who would have been among the few to actually come out ahead of such a thing.

The fact is, the industry is in real trouble. For a quite some time now they’re been wallowing like hogs in the pretty much literal flood of money provided when multinational corporations like Sony foolishly figured they could safely invest in the movie business. I hope these suits have enjoyed the ‘romance’ of owning a studio, because they’ve recieved little tangible returon on the gigantic piles of loot they;ve forked over, other than the sheer satisfaction of affording people like Jon Peters the opportunity to snort equally gigantic piles of cocaine on somebody else’s dime while indulging in the most egregious forms of sadism against pliant youngsters desparate to break into the business.

Well, the times they are a’changing, and big names mean less now than they ever did. The latest to feel the lash are producers, who since the ’80s have been living it up on cushy studio deals that gave them tons of dough in return for a first look at any projects they developed. On the whole, these deals have been disastrous for the studios who made them, but that was OK, because the corporation had put “movie people,” i.e., other producers, in charge of the studios, and why should they care? They represented, man! They stayed true to their homies! Besides, they are artists and corporations are evil so it’s just justice, ya’know?

Anyway, Variety is predictably aghast to see producers losing these deals, save only, coincidentally enough, for (gasp) those producers who might actually give the studios something back for the millions of dollars we’re talking here. This has given Variety a severe case of the vapors, as indicated by this sentence: “But, as is so often the case in corporate America, it’s those in the middle range who seem to have been hardest hit.”

Yes, that disgusting ‘corporate America,’ grossly concerned with getting some sort of return for their investments. The woe is us-ing continues: “As long as films are being made producers will get deals, but it’s increasingly rare for a studio to fork over money for an office, assistant and a seven-figure development fund.” Gadzooks! Oh, perfidious world!

Businesses change. When that happens, people get hurt. But then new business arises and people do better, often much better. But the fact is that there has been a real feeling constantly expressed during all these various strikes and upheavals that THIS IS THE WAY THINGS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE, and that something sneaky and illegitimate is going on now that people aren’t making as much money.

Smaller people are being hurt too, of course, but it doesn’t help on the sympathy front that most of the people the unions put up there to be their face are overpaid, highly condescending and generally self-righteous deca or centi-millionaires. Putting big names on camera definitely helps you get on the news. Still, if they think people busting their humps to feed their families are going to spare much time worrying that George Clooney or whoever might eventually find himself making a couple of million per picture instead of five or ten million, well, maybe they need to take the occasional expedition to the flyover country that pays for their self-owned private jets and Barbie beach houses.

This industry is a dinosaur struggling in a tar pit. I’m not sure what’s coming next, but much bigger changes are coming. And all the bitching and self-regard in the world isn’t going to change that.

  • Ericb

    Do you have any idea how film industries in other countries are dealing with these changes?

  • They tend to make smaller movies and are generally subsidized to some extent by their respective governments. Moreover, many of them release films to markets that are also protected by their governments. Hong Kong makes comparatively big movies, but still MUCH smaller than American films, and the talent over there doesn’t make zillions of dollars like they often do here.

    Hollywood will obviously keep going and keep making blockbusters, but I just think the really expensive star system is collapsing. We’ll see.

  • KeithB

    While there may have been dinosaurs caught in tar pits *somewhere*, the most famous tarpits were much too young to contain dinosaurs. Mammoths, yes, Dinsaurs, No.

    http://www.tarpits.org/info/faq/faqdino.html

  • You mean a strongly unionized industry dominated by a handful of studios that effectively operated as a cartel might not be efficient?

    I am shocked!

  • Hasimir Fenring

    Here in Korea (wow, this is the last day I can say that!) the entertainment industry is more like 70s-era professional sports. The most famous actors and musicians use their fame to get heavily involved in endorsements and advertising. Why? Because that’s where the money is, rather than in film or recording contracts or record sales.

    The government doesn’t fund films, but there is protectionism for the industry. In fact, this was a major issue in the recently-concluded US-Korean Free Trade Agreement. The industry moaned about how Korean films couldn’t survive the restrictions being loosened. The restrictions were loosened and the Korean film industry is doing just fine. Is that because, dare I say, it puts out quality films (along with a respectable output of crap)?

  • Aussiesmurf

    I think the most obvious problem with the industry is the ‘stars’ who seem to be in every tabloid magazine, but who’s suceess rate with their movies is ridiculously low.

    As a theoretically proud Australian, I may be shot for saying this, but the most obvious example is Nicole Kidman.

    Of the last twenty-five or so movies she has made in Hollywood, I would say her only unequivocal financial success was Batman Forever, where she was hardly the leading lady.

    Other modest successes include The Hours, The Others, Moulin Rouge

    But just look at the bombs : The Golden Compass , The Invasion, Bewitched, The Interpreter,
    Birth, The Stepford Wives, Cold Mountain, The Human Stain, Dogville, The Hours, Birthday Girl, Eyes Wide Shut, Practical Magic, The Peacemaker, The Portrait of a Lady.

    All financial disaster, some huge. Can’t anyone see that this is a pattern, I loathe Julia Roberts, but at least she has the ‘score on the board’ – Erin Brockovitch, Ocean’s 11,12,13, Runaway Bride, Notting Hill, etc. Same goes for Will Smith or even Tom Cruise.

    Anyway, my $0.02c…

  • Verve

    1- $20+ million dollar “stars” for crap movies
    2- Crap movies
    3- How many millions on promotion?
    4- CGI everything
    5- Crap movies
    6- Nothing but remakes and sequels
    7- Crappy distribution deals the theatres get
    8- Did I mention crappy movies?

  • Verve–That’s at LEAST 10% oversimplified.

    Maybe 11%.

  • silverwheel

    The music industry is struggling in the same tar pit. Only in their case, their business model is so out of whack that it’s incapable of living from modest successes; sales in the multi-millions are required to sustain the machinery.

  • Jason Leisemann

    On further Politics-in-Hollywood news… but *good* news, in a way, I thought this was interesting (I’d have emailed it rather than posting it here… but I’ve no clue where to find an email for Mr. Begg, probably *very* intentional!)

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/weeklystandard/20080813/cm_weeklystandard/hollywoodtakesontheleft;_ylt=Ajs.bRzCWrzgkndR59cy2hms0NUE

  • bt

    so I’m guessing you aren’t a big fan of George Clooney?

  • Luke Blanchard

    Would you know how healthy the european industries are at the moment?

  • Luke Blanchard

    Locals here in Australia don’t seem to be very interested in seeing the films that the film-makers are interested in making. I don’t know what the solution is.

    Would you know what caused the Italian industry’s problems in the 80s?

  • Actually, I like Clooney as an actor. I just think he’s the epitome of a ‘movie star’ who isn’t really a movie star. Clooney has been fairly successful on a small scale when making his smaller dramas, but really hasn’t carried a major film on his own since Perfect Storm.

    Basically, except for a very few, it doesn’t seem like many people are worth ten or twenty million a picture anymore. That doesn’t mean many aren’t worth a million or two, but that’s still a comedown from what many are making now.

  • For the record, my very non-secret email is ken@jabootu.com.