An actual post…

I thought it would be a good idea to write an actual post rather than just a product link…and even slyer to make it tie-in to his morning’s product link. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

This morning I put up a link to the latest 42nd Street Forever trailer compilation DVD, and so I thought I’d expose you guys to this delightful oddity:

Click here!

(I thought of embedding the video here directly, but was afraid it would eat up too much bandwidth.)

I actually saw this film back in the day at the Pickwick Theater (about a hundred yards from where I sit at this moment), where it was featured on a double bill with Westworld. I would have been nine or ten years old. And if you don’t believe that that sort of thing beats today’s centimillion dollar cinematic offerings hand’s down…then, sir/ma’am, we must agree to disagree.

The trailer, as you can see, is hilariously pompous, and hopefully was intentionally so, even if (for shame!) the film was hawked to unsuspecting patrons by the usually reliable MGM. The part about how they couldn’t reveal the PURE AWESOMENESS that was “Anamorphic Duovision” because it requires “special projection equipment” is, I’m sure you will shocked to learn, completely and utterly a lie. Anamorphic Duovision meant the film was shown entirely in splitscreen. And yes, it was as thoroughly headache-inducing as it sounds. You’ll notice, for instance, that exactly, uhm, zero films since have taken advantage of this spectacular advancement in motion picture presentation.

The movie itself is as bad as it looks. I mean, when they think it’s a good thing to include *that* in something meant to entice folks to part with their time and money…. I speak, of course, of the featured segment of the patently horrible floorshow song sung by Tiffany Bolling, who really should have stuck to posing for Playboy and handling spiders.

As bad as her singing is, though, for me the real treasure to me is that the song showcases what might be the laziest lyrics in music history: “Wicked, wicked/that’s the ticket/you’ve got to make me feel so wicked…” Bonus points for using ‘wicked’ as the rhyme word twice in three sentences. The result sounds like they had half an hour to finish the movie, and just started shooting in an panic and told Ms. Bolling to sing whatever came into her head at the time. And check out her band!

Also notable is that Hollywood used to have much more forgiving standards for what constituted a hot chick back in the day. And yes, that’s pretty much the climatic ‘shock’ revelation highlighted in the trailer at some length. Thanks for sparing us any unnecessary shocks, coming attraction guys!

We can really only pray that this comes out as part of MGM’s Midnite Movie DVD line.

  • Danny

    They need to make this movie in 3-D.

  • Or apply that retro 3-D process to it that they used for A Nightmare Before Christmas? That would be hilarious!

  • sardu

    Well, the “special equipment” thing wouldn’t have been a complete lie; you did need the anamorphic projection lens. Which any decent theater of the era would have, but *maybe* not all… and it sure does look like this film was aimed only very very very very slightly above the raincoat crowd.

  • fish eye no miko

    “First is was color. Then sound…”

    Uh… I’m pretty sure you got those reversed, there, chief…

    What else:
    -Hey, Ed “Kookie” Burns!
    -I love that the woman’s scream comes AFTER the guillotine falls…
    -Wow, way to give away the ending (plus, I’ve seen a movie with that plot, so I found myself thinking of it, instead).
    -Could this be one of the first “masked serial killer” movies?

  • Mary Bergman

    Actually no. Two strip Technicolor was in commercial use by 1922(thank you Wikipedia), with a couple of all-color features produced although it was mostly used only to emphasize important scenes in big-budget silents.

    The best known example of this is probably the masked ball scene in the
    Lon Chaney version of “The Phantom of the Opera”

    The Brits had an even earlier process called Kinemacolor that was used commerdially as early as 1908, but failed to gain widespraed popularity due to the need for cinemas to invest in special equipment to screen the films.

    Some early films were even hand-tinted, but that obviously wasn’t a commercially viable solution.

  • GalaxyJane

    OK, I think this ate my post. Let me try once more.

    Nope. Two strip Technicolor was alredy being used commercially by 1922 with a few features filmed entirely in color. However, it was mostly used for emphasis in the climactic scenes of big-budget silents. The first example that comes to my mind is the masked ball scene in the Lon Chaney version “Phantom of the Opera”.

    According to Wikipedia, the Brits had an even earlier process called Kinemacolor. It was used commercially from 1908-1914, eventually dying out due to the expense of fitting theaters with the special projectors required.

    This disregards non-commercially viable methods such as hand coloring individual frames of film, which were also sometimes used.

    So, in fact this is one thing the ballyhooers got correct. First color, then sound.

  • fish eye no miko

    I was aware if limited use of color (I own Phantom), but I didn’t think it was that wide spread. Thanks for the info, GalaxyJane. ^_^

  • Ed Richardson

    My favorite is near the end of the trailer when a guy jumps out a window and hits the frame (which does not break) and and he is knocked awkwardly to the side a bit. It would have been a retake had they been able to afford one or cared. It just looks funny.

  • “Anamorphic Duovision meant the film was shown entirely in splitscreen.”

    I knew it!

    Isn’t it funny how some people act like 24 invented splitscreen?