Monster of the Day #1883

We’d barely recovered from Showgirls when we got one of the most brutal stretches at B-Fest I can ever recall. Things started with Howard the Duck, which I admit I’d never seen. The film was bewildering in that I couldn’t figure out who they made it for. The budget was $35 million, a gigantic sum at the time. Let’s put it this way; Die Hard was made two years later and cost $28 million, and that was only because Bruce Willis got what at the time was a record-breaking $5 million to star. So the rest of the film cost $23 million, about two thirds what Howard the Duck did.

Despite thus needing a gigantic audience, the film is filled with raunchy elements seemingly designed to piss off parents who brought theirs kids to see the wacky sci-fi talking duck movie. Howard is seen reading a Playduck magazine, complete with nude duck woman centerfold. Before he leaves his planet we briefly glimpse the feathery breasts of a duck woman in her bath. Lea Thompson goes through Howard’s wallet and find a condom. Then she begins initiating sex with him, although they are (mercifully) interrupted. Seriously, they thought they would get back their money with that stuff? And the humor is like, “Oh, look, Howard has a Bloomingducks credit card. Get it? It’s like Bloomingdale’s, only it’s Bloomingducks, because he’s from a duck world.” It’s not even really a pun. The store here isn’t Bloominghumans or Bloomingmans.

The one element everyone loves is the incredible stop-motion monster at the end, but that was too little far too late. Especially in a film lasting nearly two hours (??). This was history’s first hint of how bad George Lucas’ film career was going to get.

  • zombiewhacker

    BTW in case anyone hasn’t mentioned it yet, Dick Miller died at the ripe old age of 90. Loved that guy.

  • Beckoning Chasm

    I’ve never seen Howard the Duck either, though I enjoyed the comic book. That’s a great looking monster, though.

  • Beckoning Chasm

    Julie Adams also passed away a couple of days ago.

  • Gamera977

    Haven’t seen it either , guess I should get around to it some day.

    They didn’t blow the cash in a bunch of re-shoots did they?

  • Gamera977

    Oh and btw Happy Chinese New Year everyone!!!

    It’s the year of the pig, not sure if I’m supposed to eat pork or avoid it though…

  • BGBear_rnh

    I’m a Chinese zodiac bull and wife is a chicken and I am sure we both are guilty of something if their is a taboo ;-)

  • Beckoning Chasm

    Wow, so you’re like the couple in “Pluggers”!

  • Rock Baker

    The film was a legendary fiasco at the time, so much so the initial reactions to the production of WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT drew comparisons. There was great relief when it was revealed that Roger Rabbit would not be a similar man-in-suit approach!

  • Ken_Begg

    Yes, it’s been a rough week. I saw Ms. Adams live a few years ago at a showing of Creature of the Black Lagoon. She was charming during her Q&A, although she did tend to lose track a little and repeat anecdotes and such. Still, it was nice to have the chance to see her. I’m glad she knew she still had a lot of fans out there.

  • Ken_Begg

    I don’t know, I think if they were focusing on reshoots the studio would have cut out the more risque humor. Seriously, I don’t know what they were thinking.

  • BGBear_rnh learntocode

    Seems like risque would be OK if it were both actually funny and subtle like the “Booby Trap” and “Shake the Weasel(s)” jokes in Roger Rabbit.

  • BGBear_rnh learntocode

    They also took the unique approach to make Roger Rabbit both funny and entertaining ;-)

  • Rock Baker

    Honestly, the only visual to really stay with me was Lea Thompson’s body during the one scene. Wasn’t the comic considered sorta edgy? That may be what the film was trying to play to.

  • Eric Hinkle

    You haven’t missed much by not seeing ‘Howard’.

  • Maybe they made it for Furries. Or Featheries. Or could it be Duckies? Whatever’s the horrific right term.

    Silliness aside, I’ve never seen Howard the Duck in its complete form, but I remember liking what I saw. Which no doubt says entirely too much about how bad my tastes are…

  • Ken_Begg

    I think that’s true, but the comic is the very definition of a cult classic. When you make a film for a then staggering 35 million dollars, you need it to be accessible to kids. I’m not arguing with choices (although as BGBear notes, they are not well executed) but again asking, “Who did they think their audience was?”

  • Beckoning Chasm

    The comic was very weird. It was created by Steve Gerber, who was very strange, and had things like Howard fighting a vampire cow. In the comics, Howard was a dead ringer for Donald Duck, except for his clothes, and when it came time to make the movie Disney told them “No way, change his look.”

  • Rock Baker

    It was certainly an odd move. You’d think the projected budget would have scuttled the film before it began, considering how limited the audience would be. Granted, by the mid 80’s, there were many a gritty movie which enjoyed healthy boxoffice and were considered “family” viewing (stuff like GHOSTBUSTERS, etc). Possibly the producers felt HOWARD THE DUCK would fall into that category?

  • Rock Baker

    This actually makes sense. Both films had adult humor (though only one was really funny) combined with whimsical special effects.

  • Marsden

    I didn’t think Howard the Duck was that bad, it just wasn’t good, either. Bland and overpriced makes a bomb.

    I think history’s first hint about Lucas was THX1138, that was boring, it took me 3 tries to sit through it and it was dull.