Stuff, TV edition…

They’ve cast the new Bosley for the recently mentioned Charlie’s Angels redo. It’s a hunky young (he looks about 12 to me) Hispanic dude, and he’ll also function as the group’s inevitable Mad Computer Skillz guy. No dumpy middle-aged comic relief Bosley for the 21st century, no sir! On a more traditional note, Charlie will be voiced by Robert Wagner, so I guess somehow owned 50% of the original series, and thus presumably is at least an equity partner in the new show.

ABC has a pilot for a cop show called Partners, in which “….two female police detectives… are fiercely loyal to one another since they’re also secretly half-sisters.” This is the sort of thing people get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to come up with.

Speaking of contrived, Amanda Peet has signed for NBC’s Bent, “romantic comedy about a recently divorced “type A” single mother (Peet) who tries hard not to fall for the sexy “surfer-dude” contractor she hires to re-do her kitchen.” I always look askance at this sort of show, since the ‘romantic tension’ thing can only be dragged out so long, and then after they get together, it often ruins the program. And really, how long can he remodel her kitchen?  At best, it sounds like it will evolve into a gender reversed version of Dharma and Greg. Genius!

Another pilot is called Good Christian Bitches. (Thanks for lowering the title bar, **** My Dad Says.) The follow up shows Good Muslim Bitches and Good Black Bitches will shortly follow, no doubt.

The second season of Justified premiered to very good ratings.  I’m currently waiting for the first season on DVD via inter-library loan. It looks to have a very nice Elmore Leonard-ish  vibe to it.

Finally, somebody is ripping off Mad Men! About time. ABC’s pilot Pan Am will be “a sexy soap set against the Jet-Age about pilots and flight attendants working at the iconic Pan Am airline in the 1960s.” Genius!

  • Ericb

    Romantic tension in a series only works when it is ancilliary to something else like on the X-files (which frankly had them non-romantic for so long it was kind of creepy when they finally kissed at the end of it all, like a brother and sister making out).

  • Well, there have been successful shows who’s main plotline was “Will they or won’t they”… Cheers and Moonlighting seems the most obvious examples. Many fans of both apparently felt a drop in interest, though, after the relationships were eventually consumated. Northern Exposure had a similar thing with, uh, the doctor and the pilot (never really watched the show), I think, although the two leads were more part of an ensemble cast there than even Sam and Diane on Cheers. From that standpoint, it makes sense that Moonlighting was hit hardest, in that Willis and Shephard were quite nearly the entire cast. And Bent sounds more like that, at least from this quick summation.

  • KeithB

    I dunno, Eldin seemed to stick around Murphy Brown’s house for a long time!

  • Mr. Rational

    Ken: Maybe, but Ericb has a point — “Cheers” and “Moonlighting” both had so much more going on than just the sexual tension. Another example I would mention would be the US incarnation of “The Office,” which has managed to sustain viewer interest even after Jim and Pam were married and had a kid. (This despite the fact that it’s a shadow of the show it once was.)

    “Bent,” meanwhile, sounds like the tension will be all it has going for it. I wonder why no one looked at the idea and said, “Okay, this sounds like it could MAYBE be a miniseries.”

  • I agree, but with Moonlighting especially, interest in the show almost instantly died when the two finally ‘did it.’

    Of course, the fact they couldn’t manage to make episodes with any sort of regularity didn’t help any.

  • fish eye no miko

    Re: Charlie Angels: Meh.. Given that the original show (and the movies) played up the sex appeal of the three female characters, I don’t find myself too terribly upset that the new show features a sexy male character.

    Partners sounds like crap. It also sounds rather self-limiting… if they play up the “half-sisters” thing as a big deal, what happens after they find out?
    BTW, was I the only one who thought of Cagney & Lacy?

    Bent: So… is the sufer-dude gay? Seriously, the actress is British and she didn’t point out what “bent” means in the UK?

    Good Christian Bitches. Wow… I consider myself a pretty strong atheist, and I find that incredibly offensive. Of course, I’m also a feminist, so that’s part of it… [shakes head] I hope the person who thought of that title gets a rash on their private parts. Yes, even if it was a woman. Hell, ESPECIALLY if it was a woman. Just.. WTF, dude?

  • I thought Amanda Peet was okay, largely because she popped her top in that bad Bruce Willis movie (guess which one?), but then I caught a clip of Howard Stern absolutely raging on her after she appeared on Letterman. I’m not a Stern fan, but holy cow he went totally ballistic on her. I’ve never heard him that mad about anything. It was pretty convincing. You can find it on YouTube.

  • ‘….I don’t find myself too terribly upset that the new show features a sexy male character.”

    For me it’s more that it continues the march towards every single TV character being in their ’20s. Other than that, I agree. Who cares?

  • Rock Baker

    Yawn, and ugh! I just get happier and happier that I don’t have broadcast television anymore!

    On the romantic tension issue, I think it comes down to each series and if the actors are good enough to carry something when the dynamic changes. I found I Dream of Jeannie to be just as entertaining when Tony and Jeannie got married, and I liked that this meant Hayden Rourke had more involvement in the plots since he could now interact with the others more closely. The only thing I really didn’t like was when they changed the set after Amanda had Tony’s house redecorated. I rather liked the 60s style interiors from earlier episodes, but the new interiors were just ugly. The show was still good though. And then there’s Wings, with its oft-shifting dynamic. It remained fresh because it remained funny, and the soap opera stuff just added an extra layer for the long time fans. What I see is that, for a sitcom at least, if you can keep it funny it doesn’t matter where your characters are in their personal lives. I know I found Cheers to be much more entertaining when Diane left, but I figure that’s mostly because she was the most annoying character on the planet and the show was just more fun to watch without constantly grimacing everytime Shelly Long spoke.

  • Man with No Face

    I think “Remington Steele” handled the “will they/ won’t they” aspect just right. Plus, there was always a solid mystery to anchor the show.

  • I remember when News Radio was on, and Dave and Lisa became a couple. Then they broke up. I kept waiting for them to get back together, because that’s how things work on TV shows (especially back then). Characters never really changed much, and I assumed this was a maneuver to reintroduce sexual tension between the two. I think it was quite a bit later when I realized with a shock one episode that the two had really broken up and the program had no intention of putting them back together again.

    And although I find most sex jokes sophomoric and lazy (because they usually are), I still remember with affection a gag where Lisa wanted a favor from Dave desperately enough that she offered to sleep with him in return. He thought about it before turning her down, but softened the rejection by nothing, “But I want you to know, it’s only because I’ve already had you.” What I really loved was that she got what he was talking about and didn’t take offense.

    Man, before Phil Hartman was murdered that show was golden.

  • Foywonder

    In defense of the Good Christian Bitches title, it is also the title of the book on which the pilot is based. Look it up on Amazon. It actually exists. The premise sounds like nothing more than Desperate Housewives set in the world of an affluent Dallas community. Funny that this is being developed for series when most of the reviews of the book on Amazon are not exactly stellar. From scanning the book reviews I noticed the words “boring”, “predictable”, and “amateurish” popped up frequently.

    I still have a hard time believing that if the show gets picked up for series it will actually go on the air with that title. Then again, ABC also has a sitcom pilot from one of the writers of Family Guy. It’s current working title: Don’t Trust the Bitch in Apartment 23.

    You should also take note of the ABC pilot Halleluah from Desperate Housewives creator Marc Cherry: “When the Tennessee town of Hallelujah finds itself being torn apart by forces of good and evil, a stranger arrives to bring justice, peace and quite possibly restore the faith in the world that the residents so desperately need. The episodes will be punctuated by songs sung by the gospel choir, which serves as a sort of Greek chorus.” So Happy Town meets Glee? Or would this be Twin Peaks meets Cop Rock?

  • Rock Baker

    Justified or not, a title like that just makes me weep that we’ve fallen so far in our entertainment culture. (I mean, it doesn’t surprise me or anything, it just provides further reason to turn my back on the newer stuff altogether.)

  • Mr. Rational

    Foywonder: That actually sounds like “Point Pleasant” meets Joss Whedon.

    And as long as we’re doing mashups, consider me another person who looks at the “Good Christian Bitches” title and shakes his head softly. It sounds too much like “Desperate Housewives” by way of the movie “Saved!”

  • Marsden

    Fish eye said: BTW, was I the only one who thought of Cagney & Lacy

    No you are certainly not.

    Bent reminds me of Caroling in the City, which is another example of things crashing when they got together. I know most people don’t admit to it but I liked the first season, plus Lea Thompson is HOT.

  • P Stroud

    Good Christian Bitches is probably pretty safe considering that Good Muslim Bitches would cut their heads off and Good Black Bitches would pop a cap in their @sses.

    On a lighter note I notice that they’ve kept the tension going in Bones pretty well I think. They’ve never let it overwhelm the main plotting of the murder mysteries. In its 6th season now they’ve kept it pretty interesting when most series are ready for a mercy killing.