Horror Films: 1985

Ten Best of the Decade: Fright Night remains arguably the best vampire movie ever, and is certainly a top contender for being the best old school vampire movie. By this I mean in terms of presenting vampires as figures of spiritual corruption, in a very specific Christian sense, as opposed to the secular brooding power fantasy vampires that have taken over the genre in the wake of Anne Rice and her myriad successors. Indeed, Fright Night presents probably the most diligently Christian conception of vampires ever. Not overtly, but in that they actually follow through with Christian logic and present vampires who must seduce and win consent to steal one’s soul away, as opposed to the traditional ‘get bitten by a vampire and you’re screwed’ vamps. These vampires can always kill you, of course (but then, so could any regular person). But they can only turn those who choose to give in to the vampire’s promises.

Aside from the deep-thinking aspect, however, Fright Night remains rip-roaring fun, giving us a great vampire in Chris Sarandon, a greater vampire hunter in an absolutely wonderful role for genre vet Roddy McDowell, and some very nice action set pieces and special effects. Top notch. Trivia: The female lead in the film is played by Amanda Bearse, better known as the ball-busting neighbor Marcy on the old Fox sitcom Married with Children.

Other Top Spot: Re-Animator What can I say about this hilariously gonzo, Grand Guignol, over-the-top Stuart Gordon adaptation of H.P. Lovecraft’s Herbert West: Re-Animator. Think Evil Dead times ten, and times a thousand when it comes to sexual shenanigans. Say what you will for actress Barbara Crampton, but she’s certainly game. (Stuart tried to up the ante again in this follow-up From Beyond, but it just doesn’t gel the way this one does.) Jeffery Combs made himself an enduring cult icon with the role, and the film remains jaw-droppingly genuinely shocking (and hilarious) in a way that really makes you appreciate how tame films are today, for all their gore. The film also offers what is probably one of my top ten film lines ever. Many other years this easily would have been the best flick of that annum, so 1985 was a pretty good one, all things considered.

Rest of the Best:

The Company of Wolves Directed by Neil Jordon, this is a bit of an arthouse film that makes explicit all the sexual and other subtest not entirely well hidden in the darker, more threatening unexpurgated fairy tales of old, primarily Little Red Riding Hood. Fans of this will want to check out the soon to be released, seemingly very similar short Little Red Riding Hood, starring Christina Ricci back in 1997.

Dead of Winter: This is a nifty thriller about a actress (Mary Steenburgen) hired for a role who find herself cast in a literally murderous scheme. Two things recommend this film; one is another (if more typical) role for Roddy McDowell, and another is a scene that reminds us that, properly set up, a comparatively small act or violence can have more dread power than a scad of chainsaw dismemberments. This is arguably a suspense film more than a horror film, but again, it’s narrower definition of horror works for me.

Return of the Living Dead: Man, there’s some good stuff in this. John Russo was, along with George Romero, one of the original Night of the Living Dead creators, and as such he also has the right to use “Living Dead” in a film title. Hence this. This is one of that rare films that ably walks the line between parody and regular horror, and it does so exceedingly well. (The first sequel, meanwhile, is more of a straight out comedy.) The central idea is that the events chronicled in Night of the Living Dead actually happened, on a somewhat smaller scale, but there was a government cover-up. Soon things are off to the races again, though. The scene in the medical warehouse after the zombie gas is released is classic stuff, and the scene where one fellow learns that shooting these zombies in the head doesn’t stop them, whereupon he shouts in crushed despair “The movie lied!,” remains a more than fond memory. The only problem I have with it is an ending that I feel strains entirely too mightily for effect. But what’ya gonna do? Great cast, too, including Clu “The Uninvited” Galager and ’80s mainstay James Karen. Meanwhile, Linnea Quigley’s punk girl nude dance in a graveyard is the stuff of legends, and legitimately so. This is available on an admirably loaded DVD, by the way, so you should definitely give it a look.

The Stuff Blob knock-off with the obligatory corporate malfeasance sub-plot, from directed and scripted by the great Larry Cohen. A corporation comes up with a whip-cream looking foodstuff that quickly addicts half the nation, but there’s a problem: It’s sentient and eating people. Michael Moriarty stars (I know, in an ’80s Larry Cohen movie, go figure), along with Garrett Morris (!), Danny Aiello AND Paul Sorvino. Bada bing, bada boom. This isn’t great, but like most of Cohen’s stuff, it’s a bit raggedy around the edges, a bit weird, and often compulsively watchable.

Meh: Cat’s Eye, Silver Bullet (hmm, what do those two films have in common?), Warning Sign. What’s interesting about Warning Sign, sort of, is that it’s one of three similar sorta-zombie movies made about that time, all centered on corporate malfeasance and each not great but fairly watchable in that “let’s see what’s on TV at four in the morning” sort of way. The other two are Mutant (1984) and Nightmare at Noon (1988). Warning Sign is probably the least cheesy and ridiculous—which is arguably either bad or good—but has the most impressive cast, including a young Sam Waterston, Kathleen “The Promise” Quinlan and the inevitable Yaphet Kato. Anyway, I wonder if there’s a few more of these that I’m not remembering.

Memorable, If Not Very Good, Schlock: Creature (Alien rip-off, you know, the one with Klaus Kinski), Future Kill (not an Alien rip-off, although that’s what the film’s famous poster seemed to promise), the utterly silly Lifeforce (ah, Matilda).

Weirdly Successful Garbage: Ghoulies, a horrible little film that eventually got three sequels!

Oh, Yeah, I’ve Got to Get Around to Reviewing That: Monster Dog, starring Alice Cooper (!).

Haven’t seen, but others love it: Creepers. (I know, get off my back. Yeesh.)

Haven’t Seen: Bioharzard, Bloody Wednesday, Boggy Creek 2 And the Legend Continues (I might have seen this on MST3K, actually, although all these Bigfoot movies tend to blur), The Bride, Day of the Dead (just never got around to it), Demons, Friday the 13th: A New Beginning, The Hills Have Eyes Part 2, The Housekeeper, A Nightmare on Elm Street Freddy’s Revenge (warned off by bad reviews and massive distaste for the first film’s ruinous ‘shock’ ending), Thou Shalt Not Kill…Except.

  • roger h

    “Boggy Creek 2 the Legend Continue” ho boy was it on MST3K. Vat a stinker.

    Directed by Charles B. Pierce, the same guy who gave us “The Norseman” with Lee Majors and the director’s wimpy son.

  • Agreed with everything you wrote about FRIGHT NIGHT. Now when you did this post were you aware that just the other day Dreamworks officially announced they were going to do a remake of it?

  • Yeah, but they’re almost certain to completely screw it up. Ditto on the Near Dark sequel, although at least in that case it’s at least possible it will be OK.

  • Plissken79

    Great call on Fright Night and Re-Animator (I love the incompetent morgue guard who somehow survives the whole gory proceedings). Return of the Living Dead is fun as well, but I will never get used to running zombies, I have the same problem with Zach Snyder’s otherwise excellent Dawn of the Dead remake

  • tim

    if you want to get the shock of all shocks, go to imdb and look at evil ed’s…. acting credits after fright night and 976-evil.

  • GalaxyJane

    And I know I’m being pedantic (yeah, go figure), but that’s Clu Gulager, with a ‘U’. Don’t feel bad, the Best Brains folks screwed that one up for years. :)

  • fish eye no miko

    Yay, it’s back! Though the format’s a bit different… hmmm.

    Oh, and the gentleman from Fright Night and Dead of Winter is Roddy McDowall. ^_^

  • fish eye no miko

    A few more things:
    -It’s Yaphet Kotto

    Creepers was originally released as Phenomena. I’ve heard because of editing (nearly 30 minutes’ worth), the original is better.

    -I’m a pretty big F:13 fan, and even I’ve not seen F13: A New Beginning lately (I know I saw on tv some years back)… Jason’s not in it and AND I’ve heard it sucks. If it were good, or Jason was in it, I’d see it. But as is… no thanks.

  • I can’t believe all of those were in 1985. Your list of bests are several of my favorite films, though I rank the Stuff a lot more highly than you do. (Though maybe that was more because of fond memories I have of introducing people to its peculiar Larry Cohen-ishness than anything else).

    Still, shocked that so many greats could come in a single year. (And I realized I really need to see Dead of Winter again, as I had forgotten about that one.Taped it off HBO back in the late 80’s and watched it several times, then lost the tape. And promptly forgot it existed. Now you have reminded me and I am going to be annoyed until I watch it again…)

  • Your memorable list also included two films that taught me important lessons: Futurekill taught me that Tobe Hooper alone is not enough to make a good movie, and Lifeforce taught me that a topless Matilda May is. At least for a teenage boy.

  • Just looked at IMDB and Hooper was not associated with Futurekill. Why did I think there was some relationship? Must have been some strange association of that Gieger box art with another film. Probably from the cheap little mom and pop video store I used in the 80’s….

    Wow, wish I would check my defective memory before I post. I should know better than rely on my memories of movies seen during my misspent youth.

  • OK. Figured it out. It was a Texas Chainsaw blurb on the box. But it was because Splatter was the Hitchhiker form TCM. OK. My memory is not entirely defective.

    Amazing how blurbs from video boxes I scanned twenty years ago stick with me. I can still recall all those oversized boxes with holographic images and remember which movies had them. (For that matter I recall that the video shop in Jumper’s Mall had a poster for Bloodsucking Freaks hidden in the back corner not exactly near the horror films, but right next to the big rental box of Caligula that always sat on the top shelf, though it seemed no one ever rented it. I wonder what useful information I am missing because I am wasting brain cells recalling that?)

  • The Rev. D.D.

    I’ve been wanting to see Thou Shalt Not Kill…Except ever since reading about it in the Evil Dead Compendium.

    Demons is a pretty fun movie. It’s like a reverse NotLD, with people trapped inside a building with the monsters rather than being beseiged from without. It’s pretty gory (in a 80s Italian horror movie? Get out!) so that’d probably turn you off a bit, but it does tend to be less scattershot in regards to plot than most Italian horror movies, and it actually makes sense more often than it doesn’t. Not that there aren’t moments…the one with the helicopter comes to mind.

  • Hasimir Fenring

    vampires as figures of spiritual corruption, in a very specific Christian sense, as opposed to the secular brooding power fantasy vampires

    After adding my voice to the chorus of agreement with your Fright Night comments, I wanted to point out that the former approach is far superior to the latter, even for heathen nonbelievers like me. If the film treats vampires as that kind of spiritual threat, I can fall under the spell, whether or not I buy threats to the soul in real life. Today’s vampires are as un-vampirelike as Chinese ‘vampires’.

  • First off, don’t dis the awesome Chinese Vampires. I own numerous Chinese vampire movies and they are terrific.

    Phenomena is actually a very fun movie by Dario Argento and well worth seeing. It features Jennifer Connally as a schoolgirl who can talk to insects, a mutant psycho killer, Donald Pleasance in a wheelchair,and a razor-wielding chimpanzee. I can’t think of anything else to make a movie perfect.

  • Ericb

    “Gone are the days when vampires were dreary, basement dwelling Eastern Europeans in capes. Now they are dreary, fey little d-bags wearing lipstick and shuffling around like unenthusiastic Lord Byron impersonators without the animal machismo or ruffled shirts. And they’re sparkly.”

    Mike Nelson

  • Mostly agree with the ones you have seen, though I do have a soft spot for the bonkers Lifeforce.

    Recommendations from those you mention you have not seen: Day of The Dead is a classic, though certainly not for the squeamish. Demons is a crazy Italian movie, lots of fun though again heavy on the gore. The Hills Have Eyes Part 2 is a for-the-money retread with unintentionally hilarious results (e.g. every surviving character has a flashback – even the dog(!)). Creepers (a.k.a. Phenomena) is OK, the uncut version is better, though it’s definitely where Argento started to lose it.

    Don’t let the end of the original Elm Street put you off the sequels, though. That stupid ending has nothing to do with any of them. Freddy’s Revenge is weird, definitely one of the lesser sequels IMHO, though the movie takes on a whole new meaning when you realise the director (Jack Sholder, responsible for the classic The Hidden) meant it as a gay allegory. I love Elm Streets 1, 3 & 4 and New Nightmare, but they’re all entertaining on some level.

  • BT

    Great job Ken. My only disagreements would be that I would have ROTLD as one the top 10 of the ’80s (“send more cops!”), and I too have a HUGE soft spot for Lifeforce, which I would have bumped up. It’s got a bit of everything. I am ALMOST certain I would have loved it if Mathilda May did not spend the entire movie completely naked, but let’s just say I’m glad I never had to make that choice.

  • Reed

    I just watched Nightmare on Elm Street again this weekend, and I did something that I had never done before; I listened to the director’s commentary. I guess it was recorded for the laser disk edition, which was put out some years before the DVD version. Some of it is very interesting, talking about the budget restrictions and how they did some of the effects. I love that sort of thing.

    Craven talks about the shock ending quite a bit. Apparently Wes’ idea was that the ending is not Nancy’s nightmare; it’s Nancy’s mother’s nightmare. He believed that she needed to be punished for her sins during (and before) the movie. Wes actually wanted Freddy to be driving the car when it pulls up to the sidewalk, but the producer didn’t like the idea, so they went with the top that looked like Freddy’s sweater instead. This in turn makes the ending much more like the sequels in tone, although obviously he could not have foreseen that.

    He also talks quite a bit about the stories in the Los Angeles newspaper that lead him to the idea of the dream killer. Fascinating stuff!

  • I understand that Lifeforce has it’s fans, but really, c’mon, are you guys saying it’s not schlock? OK, maybe it’s “good” schlock, that’s more of a personal preference sort of deal.

  • Reed

    I really only remember 2 things about LifeForce.

  • Hasimir Fenring

    First off, don’t dis the awesome Chinese Vampires.

    I’m comparing the inappropriate application of the term ‘vampire’ to the current crop of Goths-with-fangs to the equally inappropriate (and Orientalist) application of the term to jiangshi.

  • SuperVepr

    I fished Return of the Living Dead out of the drawer the other night and watched it twice. Man, that film is way better than it ought to be. Kudos to Fright Night as well. It holds up remarkably well after all these years.