Rosie kills hopes for variety show revival…

I like the variety show format, if done right (like Carol Burnett and…uh, Carol Burnett), but really, Rosie O’Donnell? I did find various points of interest in this article.

A mere 5 million viewers tuned in for the 8 p.m. premiere of “Rosie Live,” with the program earning a 1.2 preliminary adults 18-49 rating. The telecast matched ABC’s recently canceled “Pushing Daisies” as the night’s lowest-rated program on a major broadcast network.

Ouch! As usual, I’ve heard a lot of bitching on various web boards about how ABC was stupid to cancel Pushing Daisies because it was a great show. Seriously, if you’re old enough to type, you should be old enough to realize that “great show” doesn’t automatically translate to “show lots of people want to watch.” It’s amazing ABC brought the show back if those were the ratings it was pulling. How come nobody ever says “Thanks for trying” when networks even bother with offbeat shows like this, instead of bitching when, as the odds dicate, 98% of them fail?

And why did the Rosie Show not draw an audience? (Aside from the fact that its host is an insane truther who spent the last several years actively working to alienate half the country?) I think the following paragraph provides some clues:

Segments included Kathy Griffin impersonating Nancy Grace, Alec Baldwin hitting Conan O’Brian with a pie, O’Donnell singing “City Lights” with Liza Minnelli and Jane Krakowski doing a product-placement-themed striptease for White Castle burgers and Crest Whitestrips.

Rosie and Kathy Griffin together? How could this have failed?  And what, Margaret Cho was busy last night?  Then there’s this:

Critics were not kind. The NY Times described it as “hokey comedy with an enemies list.” TV Guide called it a “ghastly ego trip.” And the LA Times asked, “Rosie, what on earth were you thinking?”

Actually, if it were that bad, now I’m sorry I missed it.  And here’s a clue, if the friggin’ New York Times thinks you went overboard attacking people like Donald Trump and Bill O’Reilly, you might want to reign things in a bit.  The Times also mentioned this bit:

spinning cowboys danced with ropes (albeit in tune to a 1980s hit by Dead or Alive, “You Spin Me Round (Like a Record)”)…

Pink Lady and Jeff, you are avenged.  Man, I hope this thing is on Hulu or something.  I will say, though, that I think I found another reason that the New York Times is shedding readers.  I mean, imagine paying money to get this from a supposedly authoritative critic:

The usually funny comedian Kathy Griffin…

The what now?

 UPDATE:  Talk about a picture being worth a thousand words:

  • Ericb

    I watched it without sound while listening to a Charles Mingus cd (aside from DVDs and some sports I mostly use my tv as something for my eyes to do when I’m listening to music), anyway, I’m not exactly a trendy person or anything like that but I noticed that her guest roster seemed to be made up of people who were current about 10 to 15 years ago. That might be one reason so few people tuned in.

  • Ericb

    Oh, and even without sound it looked like a disaster.

  • Josh

    Ken, I would disagree that there’s no reason for ABC to keep Pushing Daisies. Maybe not in whatever time slot it’s in (I’m in the UK this fall, so I’m watching it online this season), but I would think that a network would be willing to sacrifice a little bit of money in exchange for the critical acclaim and Emmys the show would have brought (and was bringing) the network. I know you’ve written about this phenomenon before in the film industry-critically acclaimed films bringing “prestige” to the studio, and being financed by crappy summer blockbusters. Isn’t there a place for that in TV?

  • fish eye no miko

    Ken said: “It’s amazing ABC brought the show back if those were the ratings it was pulling.”

    Yeah. God forbid ABC dare to give a critically acclaimed, Emmy Winning show a chance. BTW, “Bitter Sweets”, the second to last episodes last year was no. 1 for the week. Maybe they thought things would pick up.

    In fact, you know what? Thank you, ABC. Thank you for bringing the show back and at least giving it a chance. At least you cared enough to try, and, sadly, it just didn’t work. You gave an equally quirky show, Eli Stone, a second season, as well. So at least you’re trying to help make TV more fun. Thank you.

  • I think there is, but there has to be a certain amount of balance. Eating a small amount of money is one thing, eating tons ot it another. By the nature of its art design and such, Pushing Daisies was probably a very expensive show. (On top of that, it had a history of going overbudget.) If it really were being watched by only five million people, that’s an extremely small number, much to small to justify such an expenditure, even if it did win an ooccasional Emmy–an uphill battle anyway, given all the competition from cable shows now.

    And let’s face it, even when networks bend over backwards to keep on such shows, they still don’t get credit. Fox went to heroic, nearly insane lengths to get people to watch Arrested Development, and when they finally gave up after keeping the show on the air for three years, still all they got was grief from fans.

    You have to realize too that the network model is dying anyway, and that these companies are facing profits and ratings that continue to diminish every single year. Indeed, since the writers’ strike, overall network ratings are down something like 14%! In just one season! So it’s not like they have a huge cushion of profits on which to rest anymore.

    This is going to continue to be a problem as the entire idea of a mass culture continues to disintegrate. There will be more and more and more niche programming, but they are going to have to find a way to produce it at much smaller budgets. You can’t justify spending two to three millions dollars an episode if you’re not drawing tens of mllions of viewers to justify it.

  • jurb

    So Ken, when is there going to be a review?

  • Hey, if anyone can get me a burned copy on DVD…

  • Chad R.

    This would be a good companion piece to the reviews of Raquel! and The Paul Lynde Halloween Special.

  • Ericb

    It is has nowhere near the surreal intensity of Rachel! or the Paul Lynde special. Its basically Rosie O’Donnell standing around on stage interacting with the occasional guest. When it came to doling out holiday kisses Jabootu certainly passed this one by.

  • Gristle McThornbody

    I find Rosie O’Donnell to be a thoroughly loathsome human being. If being subjected to the Ludovico Treatment and forced to watch any show with her in it, I’d summon the strength to rip my eyelids through the restraints.

    But that’s just me…YMMV.