Monster of the Day #3281

There are a few prominent non-Universal horror films of the 1930s. However, the other studios, while envious of all the greenbacks Universal was taking in, were quite sniffy about producing something as low brow as a horror picture, much less a monster film. So they tended to cast themselves as prestige pictures adapted from classics of literature. Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1931) is one of these, even garnering a Best Actor Oscar for Fredric March, the only such award for a horror pic until Anthony Hopkins snagged a statuette for Silence of the Lambs. Frankly, the 1931 version is not my favorite. I find it over-directed, and it gives me even more respect for the sly, deft touch of James Whale. Meanwhile, I’ve generally found March to be a bit too mannered of an actor for my taste (although I have a friend who adores him). Still, as a pre-code the film can be surprisingly frank in some regards, and is definitely worth a look.

  • Beckoning Chasm

    Before I scrolled down to the text, I thought that poster looked a lot like some of the weird Polish ones we’ve seen.

  • Jekyll and Hyde movies are like Bigfoot movies: There’s at least one guy in it with too much hair.

    I dunno. It sort of died, didn’t it?

  • Eric Hinkle

    It never ceases to amuse me that the only Jekyll & Hyde film Universal did in their ‘Golden Age’ was the one with Abbott and Costello.

    On a side note, I was dismayed to recently watch the SyFy ‘Chucky’ series debut and see that not even supernatural serial killers are permitted to be unpleasant in voice or deed, or to be unsympathetic with “troubled” kids.

  • Ken_Begg

    This is my issue with Harley Quinn. Homicidal maniac, sure. In an abusive relationship? Hell, no!

  • Eric Hinkle

    It gets disturbing when you think about the mindset behind these ideas. Apparently slaughtering nameless people in wholesale lots is less bothersome than the character having a foul mouth or sticking with her (to be fair, murderously psychotic) boyfriend?