Monster of the Day #1984

Yes, that certainly lives up to yesterday’s poster.

  • Gamera977

    Sorta a giant toothy tadpole.

    Mostly what I remember of the MST3K version was the joking about the lead character constantly having a bottle in his hand and the female lead being really thin.

  • Ericb

    I was hoping for Big Brother for this post.

  • Beckoning Chasm

    I was noticing the other day that we’re in years now, and it would be cool if Ken posted a monster from the year in question.

  • Gamera977

    Sounds cool. Good catch there EricB, I didn’t even notice.

  • bgbear_fredo

    Electrician /sarcasm

  • Wade Harrell

    The thing is, it had potential! That tooth arrangement is clearly based on Dunkleosteus, a 20-foot long prehistoric armored fish that would make an impressive movie monster. But instead they had to beat SyFy to the punch by several decades in the crappy monster idea department by crossing it with an octopus (and failing to pull that off too).

  • Wade Harrell

    I wonder if there’s beer in the sun?

  • Mike Weller

    And they burned it, IIRC. Never thought to swim under the flame, cause they floated on the surface of the water…I’m just sayin’…

  • Gamera977

    Dang! I thought the teeth reminded me of something! Good catch!!!

  • Wade Harrell

    I actually got a little excited when I first saw this on MST3K, the first shot of it is in kinda murky water and all you can see is all those teeth, it actually looked cool for a second! Probably for the best that that’s the main view you get since the closest you get to seeing the whole thing is the silhouette on sonar, and man does it look stupid, basically a fish head sticking our of the top of an octopus. I Imagine some young, naive creature designer saying to the producers, “Look at this concept art, it’s based on this awesome prehistoric fish no one has used in a movie before”. The producers say, “Nah kid, we’re going with an octopus, which has a long history crap cinema…but I do like the mouth, so slap it on an octopus and call it a day”.

  • Gamera977

    Well if a coelacanth can survive to today there’s gotta be some explanation they can come up with to how a dunky survived as well!

  • Gamera977

    BTW: Off subject again but ‘The UnXplained’ TV series hosted by Bill Shatner on the History Channel tonight is actually pretty friggin’ good. It’s by the same company that makes ‘Ancient Anal Probes’ but personally I find it a much more entertaining show. In fact I’d compare it with ‘In Search Of’ which is fun considering the hosts of each.

  • bgbear_fredo

    Neat.

  • Eric Hinkle

    How many movie versions of 1984 have there been? The only one I remember seeing was this goofy art film that had this badly-done sex subplot going all through the movie.

  • Eric Hinkle

    Even when it’s utter baloney I love those sort of shows.

  • The Rev.

    Yeah, it’s sad that this is the closest we’ve gotten to a Dunkleosteus movie.

    Sandy and I have talked about sea creatures that have somehow not gotten movies made about them that should have, and Dunkleosteus is on the top of the list, as well as Kronosaurus and similarly-sized pliosaurs (considering how many books have been written about them — check Amazon — it utterly baffles me that there aren’t any movies with them). I would also love a gulper eel movie, but that’s just me. We did get a goblin shark movie a few years ago, which was nice…even if it wasn’t very good.

  • Ericb

    There were two British adaptations in the 1950s. A motion picture in 1956 and a BBC TV movie in 1954 starring Peter Cushing as Winston Smith! I’ve seen neither.

  • Eric Hinkle

    Peter Cushing as Smith? Now I wonder if they could have done a version with Christopher Lee as Smith. Probably not.

  • Eric Hinkle

    How about a movie about that big land-going croc, Kaprosuchus?

  • Ericb

    Lee might have made a good O’Brian opposite Cushing’s Smith.

  • Ken_Begg

    Man, I wish I’d figured that out a while ago.