David Duchovny returns to soft-core roots…

Wow, two David Duchovny items in one day.  I’m surprised to have two in the same year, frankly.

Weekly Variety has a short item on HBO deciding to seek viewers through the highly innovative and fresh tactic of “pushing the envelope”, content-wise.  Whatever, dudes.  How much more envelope is there to push, these days?

Anyway, this means more sex–a lot more sex–in a couple of upcoming shows.  This is supposedly in reaction to how even basic cable channels are showing racier and more mature fare, such as F/X’s The Shield or Sci-Fi’s Battlestar Galactica.  What strikes me about those shows is not so much that they ‘push the envelope’ in terms of content, but that they are incredibly excellent television.  Even so, with audiences fragmenting, you need an increasingly smaller set of eyes to constitute a ‘hit.’  So maybe this strategy will work.  Still, with all the porn out there now it’s amazing to think that people will be drawn to a TV show by the stuff.

Anyway, Duchovny will star in Californication–clever, huh?–wherein he’s a washed-up writer (not a washed-up actor, no sir!) who has a lot of sex with different disposable partners.  Lest you forget, Duchovny is a vet of this sort of thing, having starred in the proto-cable soft-core porn show Red Shoes Diaries.  Admittedly, here he’ll be, er, the center of attention a little more often, rather than just reading and visually other people’s Letters to Penthouse.

The example of the show’s Envelope-Pushing content revolves around his “pre-adolescent daughter” who sees that night’s bed partner and remarks, “She doesn’t have any hair on her vagina.  Do you think she’s OK?”  Ah, Kids.  They say the darndest things, don’t they?

The other show is Tell You Me You Love Me (former the presumably more honest and accurate Sexlife), which we are told will feature lots and lots of male and female genitalia and, if reports are accurate, real, un-simulated sex.  Whee!  Maybe this will prove to be only hype, but really, it is the next logical (and pretty boring) step.  And we’ve seen it in recent ‘art’ movies like Nine Songs and Shortbus, so I guess it’s only a matter of time

I think the most amusing aspect of this will be the way both the makers of the shows and their viewers will pat themselves on the back for their ‘fearlessness.’  I love this line from an IMDB Shortbus reader review:  ” Is “Shortbus” provocative? Yes. Is it explicit? Yes! And these are good things in these politically authoritarian times.” 

Way to speak Truth to Power, Grrrl!!  You go, Felisfamiliaris!!  Keep Givin’ It to the Man!!

  • El Santo

    So… they’ll be playing that song by the Red Hot Chili Peppers ad nauseum, you say?

  • Ericb

    Well, yeah. Nothing goes better with cutting edge television than cutting edge, “alternative” rock.

  • Ed Richardson

    “Is “Shortbus” provocative? Yes. Is it explicit? Yes! And these are good things in these politically authoritarian times.”

    Yeah, goodness knows Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn has nothing on one day in the life of depressive New York City liberals!

    Gawd folks, I livesd in the City for over a decade and although I love it and it’s more my home than any other place, it is just loaded with mindless, parochial, anti-American hate-everything fanciful liberals. And I’m not talking about college kids. I once went on a blind date with an ad agency exec who bemoaned the fact that America didn’t “give the Soviet Union a chance to succeed.” I’ve worked for an environmental consulting firm in midtown in which a graphics designer kept Soviet agitprop posters in his cubicle along with a bust of Mao. An older fella in another cubical had a picture of Jesus with gunsight crosshairs drawn over it. I was “let go” of my consulting position there the week after I put up a picture of an American Special Forces soldier in Iraq as my desktop wallpaper.

    Most of these arthouse films show up at the Film Forum or the Angelika. I don’t want to knock either, because you can also go to them and see, say, some old Kubrick classic or the 1936 King Kong. However, many of the films they run are nameless arthouse schlock that would make Michael Moore seem like Pat Buchanan.

    Shortbus is simply the latest helping of the decadent, nihlistic crap that passes for “art” to urban liberal nutjobs.

  • Terrahawk

    As we’ve discussed on the forum many times, this just proves that the absence of standards doesn’t make for better art. Just as too many rules will stifle art, the lack of them creates a constant “pushing the envelope” mentality. The result is crass and vulgar material like what HBO is doing. Eventually there is no envelope left to push.

  • Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that Duchovny mostly did just the intro/bookends for Red Shoe. Haven’t actually seen any of them so I can’t say authoritatively. Either way, it would probably be more humorously appropriate to ding him for nudity in “The Rapture” or “Full Frontal.”

  • Chris is right, of course. An even more morose than usual Duchovny in Red Shoe Diaries merely read letters about other people’s sexlives.