Rock Baker’s Video Cheese: Scream for Help (1984)

“A 17 year old girl thinks her step-father is trying to kill her and her mother.”

All in all, not a bad flick. Not terrific, but a workable suspenser. The plot is simplicity itself: a girl thinks her step-father is trying to kill her mother, digs into his activities, then believes she too has become a target. Unfortunately, they don’t do everything they could have done with this material, mostly by making the cast so unlikable.

Our main figure is 17 year old Christie Cromwell. She’s played by an actress named Rachael Kelly, who has a whopping three credits on the IMDB. This is a pretty big part for an unknown, and her delivery makes me think she may have come from the stage, and doesn’t yet know the finer art of acting for the camera. She’s not awful or anything, but she never really convinces us we’re not watching a movie. Pulling me even further from the story is that Kelly looks almost exactly like soft-core porno ‘actress’ Misty Mundae.

The film’s initial title, ‘Phone for Help,’ was considered more accurate, but less dramatic.

Christine is constantly jumping back and forth between intelligent and stupid. She shows enough smarts to track down her step-father to spy on him and overhear vital information, but she never brings along a tape-recorder. Instead, she takes along a witness to one stake-out and ends up getting her killed. (This friend, by the way, is introduced with a nearly full-frontal nude scene, and she’s also supposed to be 17. Up to that point, I thought this film had been shot for television, boy was I wrong!)

In what I found to be the movie’s most repulsive scene, the friend notes prior to being run down on a country road that her boyfriend has impregnated her and she intends to get an abortion. While she hasn’t discussed this with her boyfriend, she’s sure this is what he’ll want.

Later, the boyfriend is at Christine’s house, supposedly mourning. They sit next to each other and he tries to kiss her. She backs him off and he openly admits his actions are out of habit from being around his deceased bunk-mate. He starts to walk home, when Christine runs out after him, then invites him up to her room to deflower her. I REALLY could have lived without that bit.

The step-father, Paul Fox (played by David Brooks) is a car salesman who Christine believes seduced her mother Karen (soap actress Marie Masters, who comes off best, cast-wise) away from her true father and married her for the family money. Karen met Paul because she owned the lot where he works (you’d think getting married to the boss of the company would advance you a bit, wouldn’t you?).

Christine is awakened one night by the sound of banging on the pipes and goes downstairs to investigate. She finds Paul coming from the basement, although he says he was working in his study, which is across the house from where he’s coming from. Christine figures he was doing something sinister down there.

The next day, a meter-reader is electrocuted, and Christine is convinced Paul rigged the fuse-box to murder Karen for her money. Christine then decides to skip school and shadow Paul as he leaves work.

I’ll avoid going into the full plot for the benefit of those who might wish to see the film. It’s not bad, and the last act is pretty good. I only wish we’d been given some more appealing characters. Paul is a jerk from the start, and Christine is too much of a drip to take seriously.

In the end, Karen is the most likable character and she isn’t given much to do. In better hands, this story really could have been something. A skilled director could even make the sleazy bits work to the film’s advantage.

Ultimately, the final half of the film works best, when it becomes an action-based suspense movie. Minus the hard R material, the film looks, feels, sounds, and plays like a tele-feature of the same period. Much of the first half even relies on music cues that sound like rejected themes for series openings. The result is a professional, but largely empty affair.

Rock Baker is a professional comic book artist and the coiner of the phrase, “Up your nose with a rubber hose.”

  • Thinking back on it now, I think the strength of the film was largely it’s premise. Unfortunately, it wasn’t handled as well as it could have been. Time has passed and I can’t recall much about it that was impressive. However, I am sure to view the film again. 

  • Grumpypants

    Is it possible this was shot for TV with the “R” material also shot so they knew they could do a European theatrical release?  I gather that was fairly common…

  • The idea occurred to me, but the hard R stuff is woven too thickly into the more prosaic stuff. This becomes increasingly true as the film progresses. Were I to guess, I’d say it was a theatrical feature produced by a company that was doing mostly TV work at the time. (You can see the Lorimar label on the poster above. I don’t know how much feature work Lorimar did, but I do recall they produced a lot of TV product back in the 80’s that I saw as a tyke.)