It Came from the DVD Shelves: The Night Monster (1942)

If you ever wondered why The Night Monster never entered the pantheon of great Universal horror movies, you need merely watch it.  Pokey despite a seemingly thrifty 73 minute running time, the film is basically a meandering, low-grade remake of 1932’s Dr. X (luckily Warner’s apparently didn’t notice, since they made that earlier film). Worse, it sadly wastes a cast that includes Bela Lugosi and Lionel Atwill.

A saucy maid (the exceedingly pert Janet Shaw) makes to call the village cop about mysterious happenings occurring at the mansion house of the horrible crippled Kurt Ingstrom (Ralph Morgan).  There’d been a recent mysterious death on the grounds recently, and moreover they keep finding a series of fresh blood stains on the carpets.  Her call is interrupted by head butler Rolf (Lugosi), who warns her to mind her own business.  She refuses, and in a rare moment of sanity for a horror movie character, demands to leave the premises immediately.

She gets a ride from the aggressively randy chauffeur Laurie (huge actor Leif Erikson).  He inevitably tries a little session of parking and sparking, but she escapes his clutches.  Then, depressingly, after all her spunk and savvy the script has her moronically return to the mansion that fog-laden night to collect her things.  A conspiracy involving hunchbacked (!) groundskeeper Torque sends away her ride, and she is forced to set off on foot.  Per the local legend, danger proves to be afoot when the area’s omnipresent frogs stop croaking.  Needless to say, the maid starts croaking instead.

Meanwhile, the three doctors who attended Ingstrom during his illness (accident?) arrive, having been summoned by their former patient.  Of the three, one is chronically guilty about having failed Ingstrom so severely, one is oblivious and ‘comically’ obsessed with glands, and the last (Atwill) nonchalantly blows off any culpability whatever.

The wheelchair-bound Ingstrom, who seems philosophical about his fate, has called the medicos together to meet his in-house swami, Agor Singh.  Singh is notable for being about the least convincing “Indian” in movie history.  Indeed, the only reason we knows he’s Indian is because of his name and the fact that he wears a turban.

Singh claims to have amazing mental powers he asserts can promote healing, which of course the Men of Science all scoff at.  This persists even after they witness him materialize a kneeling skeleton from a foreign land in Ingstrom’s sitting room.  By the way, the hands of the skeleton are dripping blood, like that found periodically on the carpets.  Somebody asks Singh to explain this, and in one of the all time great examples of lazy scripting—top five, at least—Singh replies, “There are certain details in the process that we are not allowed to explain to the uninitiated.”  You don’t say.

Also in the party are a Rebecca-esque Menacing Housekeeper, Ingstrom’s possibly crazy sister, the psychiatrist she calls in, Dr. Lynne Harper, and obvious (if lame) male lead Dick Baldwin, who like many callow leads before him is a mystery author.  The film also offers about the stupidest (not to mention racist) cop I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen all the Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes movies.  This guy is literally dumb beyond belief, and basically just wants to arrest Singh because he’s a “Hindu,” and thus obviously guilty.

The murders really pile up by the end, but they pretty much all occur offscreen, so there’s very little horror factor.  The film looks like it mostly wanted to avoid annoying the censors.  And again, despite its short length, the whole affair is pretty slow going, mostly due to the lethargic direction of helmer Ford Beebe.  Only at the last couple of minutes does the film evince any real atmosphere or spookiness, and this only makes you wonder why they didn’t try that sort of thing earlier.

Don’t get me wrong, the movie isn’t unwatchable or anything, but it’s the sort of picture you watch once because you want to check it off the list, and then have no interest in revisiting for a while.  I hadn’t seen it since I was a tyke, and I remembered the ending anyway, but I can’t imagine whipping this out again any time soon.  There isn’t really a mystery element either, since the film not only obviously fingers the murderer over and over again, but even provides several possible explanations for how he is committing the crimes.  Meanwhile, the final moments of the film, which attempt to add a note of apocalyptic finality to things, just seems comically overblown.

As noted, before, the film criminally wastes both Atwill and Lugosi, who have little screentime (to save money, no doubt), ultimately don’t do much of anything, and who never act even slightly sinister.  Indeed, Beebe obviously (and counterproductively) sat down hard on Bela, who in his few scenes plays the butler in an almost bewilderingly restrained manner.  What a waste.  Adding insult to injury, Lugosi was actually top-billed in this (for only the second, and final, time in a Universal film!), so audiences of the time must have felt particularly ripped off.

Meanwhile, Ingstrom is played by Ralph Morgan, who looks and sounds just like his brother Frank Morgan, who in turn is most famous for playing the Wizard in The Wizard of Oz.  The rest of the cast is professional, but the movie just doesn’t give them much to do.

It should be noted that the authors of the essential tome Universal Horrors disagree with my assessment rather severely.  “An original and imaginative low-budget horror whodunit,” they write.  “This lively [!!] mix of mystery, mysticism and monster menace boasts a well-mounted eeriness, a striking and unusual plot [again, I disagree, in that it reminded me strongly of the vastly superior Dr. X, which also used Lionel Atwill to far greater effect] and a handsome cast and capable direction by Ford Beebe…”  In the end, they deem it, “One of Universal’s better B’s from the wartime era.”  So give the film a try, you might like it better than I did.

If the rest of the film had lived up to its last five minutes, I’d probably throw in my hat with the Universal Horrors boys.  As it is, gentlemen, we’ll have to agree to disagree.

  • BeckoningChasm

    hunchbacked (!) groundskeeper Torque

    “My name is Torque. I look after the place when the Master is away.”

  • yeah I remember this one from being a kid and have never had any interest in re-seeing it. I felt ripped off even at 11 years old. I was especially livid that Bela was not used for anything interesting.

    why isn’t this in Nuggets?

  • Ericb

    Ok, Leif Erikson? Should one really plunder history books for stage names?

  • “why isn’t this in Nuggets?’

    Meh, too short.

  • roger h

    Ford Beebe directs some of the most watchable serials.

  • Rock Baker

    I have to say, a scene with a woman walking thru the fog and having the constant frog chirps abruptly stop certainly SOUNDS effective, but it wouldn’t be the first time a scene looked better in my imagination than on film. Still, I’ll have to give this one a look simply because of the cast! Look at that list of names!

    Imagine my confusion in history class when we first learned about Leif Erikson (Leif the Lucky) the viking, and I’d already accepted the name to belong to Jimmy Hunt’s father in Invaders From Mars. (By the way, I later saw a crime flick from the same period -sadly, I can’t recall the title- that featured the same two actors as father and son!) Leif Erikson the actor has 145 credits on the IMDB!

  • Rock — The outside scenes actually are pretty effective. Sadly, there aren’t a lot of those. And the murders are so blah that even when they start racking up in the last half hour, to an almost comical extent, they just don’t have a lot of juice. And there are all sorts of loose ends. Torque definitely seems to be in on the maid’s murder, but that’s never dealt with. I guess he just gets away with it. And the Swami knows what’s going on the whole time, but just waits until the end to do anything about it, apparently because otherwise the movie would end too soon. Etc.

  • Roger — Of course, serials had a completely difference pace than features. I mean, the direction isn’t terrible, but I just felt the whole affair was sort of torpid.

  • BeckoningChasm

    Wasn’t there another Lief Erikson, some teen idol from the late 70’s or early 80’s?

  • KeithB

    “Ok, Leif Erikson? Should one really plunder history books for stage names?”

    You mean like Englebert Humperdink?

  • John Nowak

    I’ve seen the film and I’ll go along with Ken here.

    There’s nothing really outrageously bad in the film, and a lot of moments I rather like, but it still sputters and hisses instead of catching fire.

    Sometimes a film has all the right elements and it just doesn’t work, and you can’t tell why. This should be a little gem, like Murder in the Zoo, but it just sort of… sits there.

  • TongoRad

    BeckoningChasm- fwiw, I believe you’re thinking of Lief ‘Garrett’.

    (ahem…I know this because I had a pre-teen sister in those days…)