Why did Conan go to cable…

Several possibilities, and the decision was probably predicated on a mix of them:

1)  Fox might have had trouble getting affiliates lined-up.  The new Conan show seems like a sure-fire idea, but the memory of Chevy Chase still haunts the joint, and local stations might be queasy at the idea of taking on such a huge show lest it blow up again.

Adding to this was the fact that many of these stations had already paid for programming for that slot, and would have to eat those charges aside from kicking Fox money for O’Brien’s new show.  Some affiliates might have locked in programming, meaning O’Brien’s show would play in some markets an hour later.  Probably things could have been worked out eventually, but you can’t blame Conan for going with the guys who were ready to go.

2)  Going to cable lowers expectations.  O’Brien will probably do pretty well, but by not competing directly with three different network hosts, he has a bit of a built-in excuse if he comes in third (likely) or even fourth place.

A lot of O’Brien fans would pooh-pooh that idea, but even with all the bad publicity Leno took, the fact remains that he’s the biggest guy in late night.  Per one report, “In March, Leno outdrew his main rival on CBS, The Late Show with David Letterman, averaging 4.9 million viewers compared with Letterman’s 3.7 million… ‘After a couple of early Letterman victories among young adults, Leno has taken a firm lead among total viewers and adults 18-49, and Letterman has lost virtually all the gains he made in Leno’s absence,’ Media Life Magazine wrote in response to the ratings report.”   And Leno’s been back on the air for, what, two months?

For all the (comparative) hipster swagger of Letterman, Leno has already retaken the lead from him not only in total viewers (and by a pretty big margin) but in the prime 18-49 demographic.  Possibly Letterman does better in the younger end of that scale, but I’m sure he’s not killing Leno as much as people think.  The median age of the viewers of both shows is now 56.

That’s why Kimmel is still on the air, even with his much smaller audience, and why ABC didn’t rush to dump him when O’Brien became available.  O’Brien might well have done better than Kimmel, but probably not by a whole lot, and maybe not much at all.  Plus, it’s unlikely that given the dynamics of the NBC situation that O’Brien would have been comfortable taking a slot away from somebody else.

But back to the big guys.  Largely overlooked by O’Brien partisans (with whom I have some sympathy) is the fact that Conan’s Tonight Show ratings kind of sucked.  There are many reasons why this might be so, but you can’t ignore the possibility that O’Brien remains a niche guy.  In any case, going on Fox and getting absolutely creamed by Leno, which is most probably what would have happened (Letterman and Kimmel are obviously more vulnerable to losing viewers to a Conan show), must not have struck O’Brien as a particularly attractive option.

3)  More freedom on cable:  There’s little doubt that Conan will be able to get away with more stuff on TBS than Fox.  While I personally think he was already kind of pushing the edge with stuff like the Masturbating Bear already, who knows, maybe he wants to go a lot farther.  TBS will let him.

4)  Maybe TBS threw more money at him, and/or offered him a longer guaranteed contract.

5)  Perhaps the game changer (or the biggest face-saver) is that TBS offered O’Brien ownership of the show.  That means that O’Brien can monetize the show directly (home video, downloads, etc.), and also own any new characters he creates.  Weirder things have happened than a talk show comedy character having a movie or a TV series built around it.

6)  It increases the chance that O’Brien will be able to play a character in any future Captain Planet series.

  • Ericb

    Leno’s appeal is a mystery to me and it’s not like I’m some gen y hipster; I’m 3 years away from aging myself out of the prime 18-49 demographic.

  • BeckoningChasm

    I’m honestly not a fan of any of them, though I think Conan is clever. Letterman, on the other hand, I find loathsome.

  • Ericb

    I don’t really care for any of them either but I can at least see why some people might like Letterman, Kimmel and O’Brien. Leno, on the other hand, just seems agressively unfunny and bland to me.

  • Yeah, I find Letterman to be more of a dick every year. He really did reshape the talk show, but like Mad Magazine and Hugh Hefner, he strikes me as more of relic now than anything. Admittedly, Norm McDonald KILLED Letterman for me with his amazingly on-target SNL parodies. I could never really get past those and how rote they made Letterman’s show look. Anyway, both Ferguson and O’Brien strike me as much funnier, although I’ve never really been a talk show guy.

    Leno IS bland, that’s why he does so (comparatively) well. If you’re getting ready to go to sleep, innocuous is not the worst thing.

  • BeckoningChasm

    I think Leno wants to take the mantle of Johnny Carson, who is still (for my money) the best talk show host who ever was.

    However, the reason Carson worked so well wasn’t because he was bland and could appeal to anyone; no, I think the secret of Carson’s success was that he was the world’s greatest listener.

    It didn’t matter who was on his show–authors, actors, little old ladies, whoever–you always got the sense that that person had Carson’s full attention. And while Carson would toss out little quips here and there, I got the impression they were genuinely spontaneous and not lying in wait for an opportunity.

    Letterman, on the other hand, always gave me the impression he had his “jokes” already lined up and was just looking for an opening.

    (BTW, I know many of these talk shows are rehearsed, but they are supposed to give the impression of spontaneity.)

  • Ericb

    Carson also gave out the aura of a being genuinely nice guy who happened to be funny (I don’t know how he was in reality but that’s how he appeared). The new breed, espicially Letterman and Leno, come across as completely full of themselves. They just seem so smug.

  • Heli

    Bland, unconfrontational comedy will always have a place. See also pretty much every comic strip in a major newspaper. Leno is the human embodiment of stuff like Garfield.

  • alex

    Carson was a cold fish and I read plenty of account of people who met him and were suprised at how cold and distant he was in real life. Check out the Youtube clip of Wayne Newton on Larry King talking about Carson as a ‘mean spirited human being who has hurt a lot of people’. Ouch!

  • BeckoningChasm

    I’d heard similar stories about Carson, though to be honest I don’t really consider Wayne Newton to be the most reliable source.

    My point wasn’t about how Carson behaved in real life, but on screen, which is what most people would see. Pretty much everyone in entertainment has a very calculated and protected public image which may have nothing to do with how they behave when the cameras are off.

  • MatthewF

    Wait, isn’t the best thing in life to crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women?

  • Reed

    And then there’s my favorite ever Johnny Carson quip. He had Arnold Palmer’s (the great golfer) wife on the show. He asked her if she helped him with his golf game and she stated (completely irony free) that before each match she kissed his balls. Carson replied, “I bet that stiffens his putter!”

    I may have totally made that up. I hear voices and write what they tell me…

    I loved Letterman when I was in college; now I can’t believe that he’s still on the air. I haven’t watched his show in 20 years.