No Watch Party for four weeks….

I don’t “do stuff” often, but B-Fest is in two weeks, and Basement Fest (a private affair we started while B-Fest was shuttered for Covid and have continued) is the week after. So it will be March 3rd before we resume.

So I tried to counterprogram the previous Watch Party offering, Doctor Faustus with Richard Burton and (sorta) Elizabeth Tayler. So I showed a like 12 year old Steven Segal movie, Born to Raise Hell. Hilariously, after all the awful flicks we’ve all grimly slogged through, this was the one that people just gave up on and we all just chatted about other things.

Quoth GalaxyJane, in regards to my comment to her that we all continued to pay attention to Doctor Faustus but not Seagal’s offering:

*I think that as veterans of Richard Burton and of the bad movie wars in general, we all expected that Dr. Faustus would somehow pay off by the end. All those ridiculous sets, the cheapass opulence and Burton chewing scenery should have produced at least a few nuggets of Bad Movie Gold. And when it never did despite all that panning we just got mad at it.

Last night’s offering made clear from the get go it was nothing but pure unadulterated garbage, and edited in a blender, so nobody ever got super invested in whether it ever did anything interesting or not so we were just able to let it go and make our own entertainment.

And at least I found Seagal’s immobile waddling and inability to climb stairs or walk at a fast pace pretty funny given his status as the action lead. Damn it was misogynistic though, in the actual sense of the word, nit the meaningless twaddle version that gets trotted out to explain any imagined shortchanging of a female, or just any ideas one doesn’t like, or intend to honestly engage.”

I should note that compared to Seagal’s current “films”–yes, he’s still grinding them out in Russia–Seagal was relatively mobile here. We literally see him, not his stuntman, get out of chairs, or climb in or out of a van. That might not sound too impressive, but in Seagal’s current films he basically never gets out of his chair. Probably because he has a team of six guys to hoist him and it wouldn’t burnish his action hero creds if we watched the process. Think the reverse of how they used to hoist fully armored knights up onto their horse.

  • I think we all paid more attention to Alabama’s Ghost and whatever that lame action flick we watched than this thing. And got more enjoyment out of it to boot.

    It’s a mess of clichés filled with people we don’t care about, with a lead who went from incomprehensible to shouting all his lines. And it’s ugly, too. You’re supposed to care about this evil drug dealer who lost his wife, who in the course of looking for the killer tortures a woman to death.

    I don’t think it’s to the depths of, say, Pieces or Don’t Answer the Phone in terms of over all hatefulness. Still, showering after watching it is probably a good idea.

    Oh, and I’m not one to complain about May-December romances, but they needed to find a woman to play Seagal’s wife that doesn’t look straight out of junior high. Seriously. For all the impact she had on the story, she could have been his daughter and the audience spared a little squick.

  • Oh, and I’m not one to complain about May-December romances, but they needed to find a woman to play Seagal’s wife that doesn’t look straight out of junior high. Seriously. For all the impact she had on the story, she could have been his daughter and the audience spared a little a LOT of squick.

    FIFY

  • Well, even if it was age appropriate, Romeo Seagal is always going to be a LOT of squick…

  • Gamera977

    I think I actually liked it more than ‘Staying Alive’. ‘SA’ was at least a ‘real’ film, professionally produced and played in a theater. This thing was cheap direct-to-DVD krap with an aging star. I guess I didn’t expect much of it and it didn’t deliver much. Looking at this thing for serious entertainment is like scanning the back of a bubble gum package for the nutritional content.

    I didn’t really notice the misogynic content until GJ pointed it out. As I said I just wasn’t really paying that much attention to it at all. But yeah after she pointed it out it’s pretty obvious.

    And I won’t even compare it to ‘Alabama’s Ghost’. ‘Born to Raise Hell’ was awful but ‘Alabama’s Ghost’ was like peering into the mind of Cthulhu. Only madness and pain can come of that…

  • Gamera977

    BTW, I watched an abomination on Amazon Prime last night that was at least as bad as ‘Born to Raise Hell’.

    I am NOT giving the name for fear that Ken will use it as a future watch party pick…

  • Eric Hinkle

    It wasn’t ‘El Santo versus the Aztec Mummy’ was it? I watched that one last night, and I am shocked to believe that there was an actually boring Santo flick.

    Oh, and talking bad movies — anyone else see any trailers for Cocaine Bear? Which is a movie about a black bear that gulps down a hundred pounds or so of cocaine and goes berserk. Going by the trailer I saw they seem to be trying for ‘Grizzly with slapstick comedy’. But it just looks so cheap. Like an Asylum movie made for the SyFy Channel.

  • Gamera977

    Nope, that one was at least someone entertaining…

    Don’t tell Ken but it was ‘Dr. Tarr’s Torture Dungeon.’ It gives 2021 as the year but it looks like early to mid ’70s. It looks like just goofy awful fun but it’s pretty friggin’ sick. Rape at 20 mins in. Insane people used as comic relief. I kept stopping it to wander off but finally got around to finishing it.

    It wasn’t worth it…

    ‘Cocaine Bear’ sounds… well… it sounds about as good as anything coming out of Hollywood these days. Aka slamming my head in a car door sounds about as entertaining….

  • Eric Hinkle

    I’ll say this for ‘Cocaine Bear’. It looks to have been made so cheaply it can’t help but to turn a profit. Which is a lesson Hollywood needs to learn, for its own sake.

  • Yeah, you gotta be careful with Amazon Prime. I think they do publication date, as in when this particular version came out, rather than the actual date. in this case, Dr. Tarr’s Torture Dungeon is about as old as I a… as what time period you think it is. Maybe a little later. Like the Eighties. Or the Ninties. Yeah, yeah, that’s the ticket.

    Cocaine Bear I’m going to have to see in the theaters. It looks dreadful but in a fun way.