It Came from Netflix: Sherlock Holmes and the Baker Street Irregulars (2007)

Every British actor it seems, no matter how ill suited for the role, eventually gets a whack at playing Sherlock Holmes. (Hell, even raised in Canada American Matt “Max Headroom” Frewer got to play the part very badly a number of times.  He was even worse in the role than Tom Baker.) In this Brit TV movie, presumably the pilot for a series or another movie or two, Jonathon Price gets his shot. He’s not bad, really, but he’s let down by the film’s take on Holmes. He’s a bit too soft, and the wistful quality they give him reeks of an attempt to ‘humanize’ the Great Detective. Blech.

In any case, here Holmes is all but a supporting character to the titular Baker Street Irregulars. In the Canon, the BSI is a group of street smart ragamuffins that Holmes uses as spies and information gatherers. Here they progress to being more or less detectives in training, and presumably any subsequent series would have focused more or less entirely on them.

This isn’t the worst Holmes adaptation I’ve seen, but that’s because there are a lot of truly awful ones. Still, this one doesn’t exactly cover itself in glory. As noted, Holmes is softened up a bit too much. Watching him earnestly declare to one suspicious young lady that “I do care” was a tad revolting.

The other attempts to ‘update’ the material and make it more ‘relevant’ are equally lame. The BSI kids are rotely gender balanced, with the toughest member being of course a girl, and their ensemble even includes a young Chinese lad. Meanwhile, the other girl is mysteriously a bit of a toff, allowing her to go undercover in upper class settings.

Particularly grating is a slew of anachronistic language. Threatening notes are at one point described as “hate mail” (!!!), and at another juncture one of the kids actually responds to some good news by exclaiming, “Awesome!” Egad! This was so egregious I coulnd’t believe my ears and had to replay it several times before admitting I’d heard it correctly. Considering how horrendous these notes sounded to my American ears, I can only imagine how they played in Old Blighty proper.

Worse is that the movie involves what in pastiches has become one of the Canon’s most over and ill-used characters, Irene Adler. Not only is Adler of course pushed here as a possible romantic interest for Holmes, but much, much odder, she is transformed into a wantonly murderous, Moriarty-esque master criminal. I mean, seriously, what the hell? She disguises herself as a man at one point, and they accomplish this remarkable disguise by having ‘her’ played an actual man at this point. Stage make-up was apparently far more progressed back then than I had thought.

The mystery is pretty weak, and Holmes never really seems to be deducing stuff so much as given solutions by the script. The transport of Adler’s final goal would require far more resources than she brings to bear, a fact that is laughably obvious. And the crime is basically just a rip-off of the classic Holmes short story The Red Headed League. Meanwhile, Holmes’ police detective antagonist is predictable moronic and spiteful.

As for the kids, they half try to show the ‘reality’ that the kids were basically homeless scroungers, but the rest of the time they portray their lives as jolly good fun. Moreover, one of the BSI kids is given a ‘major plot twist’ so thoroughly telegraphed that I was actually forced to tip a Western Union boy. I mean, the writers of Murder, She Wrote would have snorted in derision.

And thank goodness I wasn’t drinking anything when they cut to the last shot of the show, which involves the characters walking side by side towards the camera in slow-motion (!), a shot so overused since The Right Stuff back in 1983 that it should be outlawed by act of Congress. Actually, I’m probably giving the director too much credit. I’m sure he meant to rip off Reservoir Dogs. Apparently they didn’t think that was insulting enough, however, since they then follow this with a mind-bendingly stupid ‘shock’ sting.

Price is a fine actor (although he blows about every single other cast member out of the water), and Holmes completists may wish to give this a look for his sake. For myself, may I suggest Nicholas Meyers’ marvelously fun Seven Percent Solution? Hell, even Young Sherlock Holmes. You’ll be a lot happier.

Uhm, I kind of liked the theme music.  Not great, but pretty good.  There, I said something nice.

  • fish eye no miko

    Pardon the long reply; this is a topic I’m quite interested in. Also, there’s a bit of bad language ahead.

    Wow, this sounds awful…
    A few quotes:

    “He’s a bit too soft, and the wistful quality they give him reeks of an attempt to ‘humanize’ the Great Detective. Blech.”

    Blech indeed. One of the things that makes Holmes an interesting character–and makes him HOLMES, dammit–is his cold, detached demeanor.

    “The other attempts to ‘update’ the material and make it more ‘relevant’ are equally lame. The BSI kids are rotely gender balanced,”

    Dude, I’m a feminist and yet this sort of thing just pisses me off. It’s just stupid and insulting. There are plenty of valid heroic/cool/empowered/other-good-stuff female characters, stop trying to shoehorn ones into places they don’t belong!

    “which involves the characters walking side by side towards the camera in slow-motion”

    Ah, the Power Walk. I actually think this can work, in the right setting… Buffy, Angel, The Arlong Arc in One Piece? Hell yeah. Sherlock Holmes? Hell no!

    As for actors playing Holmes… I still think Brett was the best. He actually DID capture Holmes’ coldness, his eccentric nature… everything I love about the character. And I thank the creators of that show immensely for letting Watson be smart again. One of the reasons I tend to avoid the Rathbone versions is I don’t think I could stand Nigel Bruse’s stupid bumbling Watson… ~_~

    Oddly enough, one of the other versions of Holmes I liked was Rupert Everett in the otherwise excretable “SH and the Silk Stocking”. It’s so clearly written from a modern sensibility, which is just… off. I’d love to see Everett in something from, or at least closer to, the Canon. And Ian Hart can come, he was good as Watson (again smart Watson = happy Fish Eye).

    BTW, I’ve never seen Tom Baker’s Holmes; may I ask what your problems with his interpretation are?
    Hee.. I just looked on Wiki. He played Holmes after his stint on Doctor Who; interestingly enough, he dressed as Holmes (well, the stereotypical version of him) in one episode of that show (“The Talons of Weng-Chiang”)…

    Oh, and before I forget (I almost did!):

    “Moreover, one of the BSI kids is given a ‘major plot twist’ so thoroughly telegraphed that I was actually forced to tip a Western Union boy.”

    … I think I love you.

  • Brandi

    the characters walking side by side towards the camera in slow-motion (!), a shot so overused since The Right Stuff back in 1983 that it should be outlawed by act of Congress.

    Does this in fact date back to the Magnificent Seven, or were they riding at the camera? (Regrettably, I haven’t seen it yet.)

  • Food

    I dig the Doyle’s Holmes, so I get miffed when film butchers him. Only Tarzan has been butchered worse. But even I’ll admit that Doyle’s Holmes stories could get repetitive. The entire “Casebook of SH” is just variations of older stories. Doyle had lost interest by then.

    I understand that Larry Hagman and Leonard Nimoy have each also taken a whack at playing Holmes. Is that so?

  • The Mag Seven do ride towards the camera, as I recall, but not in slo-mo. Far closer to the mark, I think, if still sans slo-mo would be all the various versions of the Gunfight at the OK Corral, with the Earps and Doc Holliday striding down the street side by side. Still, it was The Right Stuff’s iconic shot of the astronauts walking in a line in slo-mo that really made this image shot of the most aped in film history, helped by Tarantion when he used it for RD.

    Nice to know we have so many Holmsians, by the way.

    I saw the Tom Baker Hound of the Baskerville filmed play a long time ago, but the basic problem was that he played Holmes exactly like he played the Doctor, all insane grins and pop-eyes.

    Brett, of course, in indeed the bee’s knees.

    Case of Evil remains the worst and most egregiously awful ‘reimagining’ of Holmes I’ve yet seen. I really have to review that some day.

    And I love you too, Fish Eye.

  • Luke Blanchard

    The worst one I’ve seen was the 2002 TV version of Hound of the Baskervilles, with Richard Roxburgh as a febrile and unreliable Holmes and Ian Hart a hostile Watson. But I haven’t caught Case of Evil.

  • Sandra

    Basil Rathbone is still my ideal Holmes. Not in those crappy films where he fights Nazis, but the original two, in the proper 19th Century setting, THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES and THE ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES. You haven’t lived until you’ve seen Basil singing “I do like to be beside the seaside”.

  • The Mutt

    William Shatner. Greatest Holmes ever!

    Kidding, of course. I thought Christopher Plummer was terrific in Murder by Decree.

  • Kooshmeister

    Wait, what? Jonathan Price as Holmes? In 2007? Not to knock Mr. Price’s age or anything but isn’t he a bit….old? Unless this story is intentionally taking place later on in Holmes’ life when he’s getting on in years. Also, turning Holmes’ would-be girlfriend into “a female Moriarty” smacks of the Basil Rathbone film The Spider Woman (in which the movie’s villainess is, in fact, referred to as “a female Moriarty”). I think I’ll stick with Without a Clue (which despite being a spoof actually puts forth a reasonably good mystery, not to mention an awesome Moriarty in Paul Freeman) and the Jeremy Brett series.

  • fish eye no miko

    The Mutt said: “William Shatner. Greatest Holmes ever!”

    Oh, thank God, I thought I’d just imagined seeing that! He played him in a version of Hound of the Baskervilles, right?

    (wait, Firefox’s spell-check doesn’t recognize “Berkervilles”? WTF?)

  • Reed

    So, just looking through this response string it looks like the most adapted AC Doyle story ever is The Hound of the Baskervilles. So, while we’re at it I’ll throw my hat in the ring for Peter Cushing as Holmes in, of course, The Hound of the Baskervilles. While he is, unfortunately, underused in the film I thought that he mades a dandy Holmes. I mean, come on, it was Peter Cushing! People always remember his seriousness and dedication, but he also has just the right touch of whimsy. Holmes was quite a contrarian, after all.

  • Luke Blanchard

    Come to think of it, there was a comedy version by Peter Cook and Dudley Moore in 1978 that I remember as an absolute disaster.

    I should explain that the 2002 version was an earlier effort by the outfit that made And the Case of the Silk Stocking. With the second film they apparently tried to correct the mistakes of the first, so Hart’s Watson’s hostility towards Holmes was dropped.

  • Wayne

    Wow! Gender balanced Baker Street Irregulars! A kinder gentler Holmes! Turning Irene Adler into a murderess! “Awesome!” This sounds like the worst Holmes on record. It sounds even worse than the horrific “Without A Clue”. All the changes sound pretty stupid and pointless. Seriously the Baker Street Irregulars are supposed to be GUYS! I have nothing against girls but they would be all wrong in that group. And turning Adler into a murderess. I mean–WTF??? As for Price–I can take him or leave him but I have no doubt he’s good as Holmes and probably the only good thing about this.

    As for my favorite Holmes–I only have two. Basil Rathbone (I don’t like Watson being portrayed as an idiot either but Rathbone was just perfect) and Christopher Plummer with James Mason as a pretty good Watson. Those two gave the most faithful versions of Holmes that I ever saw.