I love making fun of bad movies, but I couldn’t take this one. (And that’s rare, really!) I barely got past the restaurant scene before I had to turn it off. (To the idiots who think that it’s just because I’m female, I lasted longer than my husband did. He’d left the room in disgust 15 minutes earlier.) It was so unbelievably offensive and stupid, and yet so BORING. Probably one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen–I’d sit through Manos a thousand times before I’d try to finish “Tomcats” again.

Anyway, your essay was super funny–way more entertaining than the movie itself–and you brought up some great points. I have no idea who your angrier commenters are…probably Gregory Poirier himself, because there’s no way that two different people on the planet would not only enjoy Tomcats but feel the need to defend it.

Only because she watched this horrible movie willingly, I’ll wager…

“Your writing sucks, and you waste it on this hilarious movie.”

The fact that you found this movie hilarious already reveals your opinions on everything are to be taken with a grain of salt the size of the Rock of Gibraltar. Or your ego. Whichever.

Also, how does one “waste” sucky writing?

“I have written essays that were better than this – this coming from a high school student from Denmark.”

I call bullshit on that one. You couldn’t even write an interesting four-sentence post.

“Get laid or something, you seem mad at the world.”

Ah yes, when out of ideas, insinuate your opponent doesn’t have regular sex. That’ll learn ‘em.

Thank you, Chris, for showing us that being a stupid wanker is something that transcends all borders and nationalities.

However, if the price of this greatness requires one to find Tomcats “hilarious”, well…

JD, of course you liked the movie, because you’re a goddamn moron!

Anyway, his hypothesis doesn’t pan out when you consider I watched it with a group of guys during Bad Movie Night, and we reacted about the same way. Not a woman in the group and we still didn’t howl with laughter.

Of course, we’re not goddamn morons, so…

Anyone else notice how this would imply Natalie – as a cop – has been posing as an undercover prostitute for over to seven years, at least since Max’s wedding???

Unless she’s trying to bring down all of Congress by proving that every member has had a fling with a hooker, what the Hell has she been doing all this time?